@inproceedings{gao-etal-2026-mitigating,
    title = "Mitigating Spurious Correlations in Text Classification Using Latent Space Geometry",
    author = "Gao, Jiasen  and
      Chen, Xiaoliang  and
      Miao, Duoqian  and
      Gu, Xu  and
      Li, Xianyong  and
      Du, Yajun",
    editor = "Liakata, Maria  and
      Moreira, Viviane P.  and
      Zhang, Jiajun  and
      Jurgens, David",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, United States",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl/2026.acl-long.1270/",
    pages = "27525--27539",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-390-6",
    abstract = "Spurious correlations cause deep learning models to rely on predictive shortcuts that hold in the training data but break under distribution shifts, leading to large performance drops for minority groups. Existing strategies often rely on costly group annotations or employ unstable adversarial training. In this paper, we propose Prototype-guided debiasing using Robust Invariant Feature Transformations (PRIFT), a novel framework that mitigates spurious correlations by manipulating latent space geometry. Specifically, we introduce a prototype-guided modeling approach that leverages natural language prompts to represent confounders, transforming abstract biases into interpretable geometric anchors without auxiliary classifiers. Based on these anchors, we introduce a centered projection operator that adaptively purifies representations by removing confounding deviations specific to instances while preserving essential semantic structure. Furthermore, PRIFT can handle confounding factor information at different levels, ranging from true labels to unsupervised latent inference. Experiments on four text classification benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our method; notably, PRIFT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and improves worst-group accuracy by over 20{\%} on the CivilComments dataset compared to standard empirical risk minimization."
}