Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a standard post-training paradigm for large language models (LLMs), typically relying on group-wise reward and advantage normalization for stability. In set-valued multi-answer tasks, where multiple outputs may be simultaneously correct, this normalization can over-amplify a small number of early high-reward samples, suppressing learning signals from other valid generations and leading to overly concentrated updates. We propose Entropy-Aware Reshaping of Reinforcement Signals (EARS), a framework that reshapes how learning signals are normalized and aggregated. EARS uses token-level predictive entropy as an uncertainty cue to compute entropy-weighted reward statistics for advantage normalization, encouraging broader exploration and more balanced learning-signal allocation early in training. An adaptive decay schedule then anneals uncertainty-aware reweighting back to standard group normalization to ensure stable convergence. EARS further incorporates a correctness-gated multi-head process reward that provides auxiliary supervision on reasoning traces while remaining aligned with verifiable correctness. Experiments on MCTACO and MMLU-Multi using Qwen2.5-7B and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct demonstrate consistent improvements in exact-set accuracy, training stability, and cross-dataset transfer performance on set-valued multi-answer reasoning.

We present the results of our system for the CoMeDi Shared Task, which predicts majority votes (Subtask 1) and annotator disagreements (Subtask 2). Our approach combines model ensemble strategies with MLP-based and threshold-based methods trained on pretrained language models. Treating individual models as virtual annotators, we simulate the annotation process by designing aggregation measures that incorporate continuous relatedness scores and discrete classification labels to capture both majority and disagreement. Additionally, we employ anisotropy removal techniques to enhance performance. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods, particularly for Subtask 2. Notably, we find that standard deviation on continuous relatedness scores among different model manipulations correlates with human disagreement annotations compared to metrics on aggregated discrete labels. The code will be published at https://github.com/RyanLiut/CoMeDi_Solution