Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are foundational in various applications due to their extensive knowledge from pre-training and fine-tuning. Despite this, they are prone to generating factual and commonsense errors, raising concerns in critical areas like healthcare, journalism, and education to mislead users. Current methods for evaluating LLMs’ veracity are limited by the need for extensive human labor, test data contamination, or limited scope, hindering efficient and effective exposure of errors. To address these challenges, we propose HalluHunter, a novel, fully automated framework for systematically uncovering factual inaccuracies in LLMs. HalluHunter employs a knowledge-graph-based approach, extracting fact triplets to generate diverse question types for single- and multi-hop reasoning using rule-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Its iterative process starts with random triplet selection for question generation, followed by adaptive selection in subsequent iterations, targeting triplets where LLMs frequently err based on their performance analysis. Our extensive tests on nine prominent LLMs reveal that HalluHunter can trigger factual errors in up to 55% of questions in these models. Moreover, we demonstrate that HalluHunter’s test cases, particularly in adaptive selection, could further expose the weaknesses in benchmarking the factuality in LLMs meanwhile maintaining the coverage of questions. All code, data, and results will be released for future research.

Current research on long-form context in Large Language Models (LLMs) primarily focuses on the understanding of long-contexts, the **Open-ended Long Text Generation** (Open-LTG) remains insufficiently explored. Training a long text generation model requires curation of gold-standard reference data, which is typically nonexistent for informative Open-LTG tasks. However, previous methods only utilize general assessments as reward signals, which limits accuracy. To bridge this gap, we introduce **ProxyReward**, an innovative reinforcement learning (RL) based framework, which includes a data synthesis method and a novel reward signal. Firstly, **ProxyReward Dataset** synthesis is accomplished through simple prompts that enables the model to create automatically, obviating extensive labeled data or significant manual effort. Secondly, **ProxyReward Signal** offers a targeted evaluation of information comprehensiveness and accuracy for specific questions. The experimental results indicate that our method ProxyReward **surpasses even GPT-4-Turbo**. It can significantly enhance performance by 20% on the Open-LTG task when training widely used open-source models, while also surpassing the LLM-as-a-Judge approach. Our work presents effective methods to enhance the ability of LLMs to address complex open-ended questions posed by humans.