LLM role-playing, i.e., using large language models (LLMs) to simulate specific personas, has emerged as a key capability in various applications, such as companionship, content creation, and digital games. While current models effectively capture character tones and knowledge, simulating the inner thoughts behind their behaviors remains a non-trivial challenge. Towards cognitive simulation in LLM role-play, previous efforts have mainly suffered from two critical deficiencies: the lack of high-quality datasets with explicit reasoning traces and the absence of reliable reward signals aligned with human preferences. In this paper, we propose HER (Human Emulation Reasoning), a unified framework for cognitive-level persona simulation. HER introduces a dual-layer thinking mechanism that strictly distinguishes characters’ first-person thinking processes from LLMs’ third-person reasoning. To bridge the aforementioned gaps, we curate a reasoning-augmented role-playing dataset via a reverse engineering strategy for supervised learning, and construct human-aligned evaluation principles and preference-based reward models for role-play reinforcement learning. Leveraging these resources, we train HER models based on the Qwen3-32B backbone via a hybrid paradigm of supervised learning (SL) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, our models significantly outperform the Qwen3-32B baseline, achieving a 30.26% on the CoSER benchmark and a 14.97% on the MiniMax Benchmark. Our datasets, evaluation principles, and trained models will be released to facilitate future research in cognitive-level LLM role-playing.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in reasoning and generation, serving as the foundation for advanced persona simulation and Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs). However, achieving authentic alignment with human cognitive and behavioral patterns remains a critical challenge for these agents. We present HumanLLM, a framework treating psychological patterns as interacting causal forces.We construct 244 patterns from ∼12,000 academic papers and synthesize 11,359 scenarios where 2-5 patterns reinforce, conflict, or modulate each other, with multi-turn conversations expressing inner thoughts, actions, and dialogue.Our dual-level checklists evaluate both individual pattern fidelity and emergent multi-pattern dynamics, achieving strong human alignment (r=0.90) while revealing that holistic metrics conflate simulation accuracy with social desirability.HumanLLM-8B outperforms Qwen3-32B on multi-pattern dynamics despite 4× fewer parameters, demonstrating that authentic anthropomorphism requires cognitive modeling—simulating not just what humans do, but the psychological processes generating those behaviors.Our dataset, code, and model are available at:https://github.com/YJGoodbye2024/HumanLLM

As large language models (LLMs) grow more capable, they face increasingly diverse and complex tasks, making reliable evaluation challenging. The paradigm of LLMs as judges has emerged as a scalable solution, yet prior work primarily focuses on simple settings. Their reliability in complex tasks—where multi-faceted rubrics, unstructured reference answers, and nuanced criteria are critical—remains understudied. In this paper, we constructed ComplexEval Bench, a challenge benchmark designed to systematically expose and quantify Auxiliary Information Induced Biases. We systematically investigated and validated 6 previously unexplored biases across 12 basic and 3 advanced scenarios. Key findings reveal: (1) all evaluated models exhibit significant susceptibility to these biases, with bias magnitude scaling with task complexity; (2) notably, Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) show paradoxical vulnerability. Our in-depth analysis offers crucial insights for improving the accuracy and verifiability of evaluation signals, paving the way for more general and robust evaluation models.

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have achieved breakthrough progress in many dialogue generation tasks. However, their lack of emotion and fine-grained role awareness limits the model’s ability to provide personalized and diverse interactions further. Current methods face high costs in collecting high-quality annotated data for scenarios such as role-playing, and traditional human alignment methods are difficult to deploy due to the inherent diversity of model behavior in role-playing scenarios. Inspired by the alignment of models for safety behaviors through RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback), in this paper, we revisit model role-playing behavior from the perspective of persona alignment and propose a novel annotation-free framework named Persona-Aware Contrastive Learning (PCL) to align LLMs’ behavior during role-playing, enhancing the model’s role consistency. Specifically, we first design a role chain method to encourage the model to self-question based on the role characteristics and dialogue context to adjust personality consistency. Then, we further enhance the model’s role-playing strategy through iterative adversarial modeling between the use of role characteristics and not. Experiments on both black-box and white-box LLMs show that LLMs equipped with PCL significantly outperform vanilla LLMs under automatic evaluation methods (CharEval & GPT-4) and human expert evaluation.