Code explanations are increasingly generated by large language models and used in software engineering workflows, making reliable evaluation essential. However, existing model-based and embedding-based methods often fail to distinguish correct explanations from partially or fully incorrect ones, and their similarity scores are poorly calibrated and do not reflect meaningful differences in explanation quality. To address this, we propose ODASim(Orderly, Dstinctive, and Absolute Similarity), a model-agnostic graded fine-tuning framework for embedding models that learns calibrated similarity representations between code and explanations. To support fine-grained supervision and evaluation, we also introduce ODA-X, a novel benchmark for code-to-explanation quality grading, comprising code–explanation pairs graded similarity labels derived from strategic perturbations of gold explanations. We apply our ODASim approach to multiple embedding models and evaluate it on two benchmarks: widely popular CodeXGLUE and our proposed benchmark ODA-X, spanning four programming languages - Python, Java, JavaScript, and Go. Results show that our method achieves up to 35% improvement in F1 score and 85% reduction in Expected Calibration Error (ECE), enabling reliable evaluation of code to explanation quality.

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to understand both natural language and code, driving their use in tasks like natural language-to-code (NL2Code) and code summarisation. However, LLMs are prone to hallucination—outputs that stray from intended meanings. Detecting hallucinations in code summarisation is especially difficult due to the complex interplay between programming and natural languages. We introduce a first-of-its-kind dataset, CodeSumEval, with ~10K samples, curated specifically for hallucination detection in code summarisation. We further propose a novel Entity Tracing Framework (ETF) that a) utilises static program analysis to identify code entities from the program and b) uses LLMs to map and verify these entities and their intents within generated code summaries. Our experimental analysis demonstrates the framework’s effectiveness, leading to a 73% F1 score. The proposed approach provides a method for detecting hallucinations by tracing entities from the summary to the code, allowing us to evaluate summary accuracy and localise the error within the summary.

Contracts are arguably the most important type of business documents. Despite their significance in business, legal contract review largely remains an arduous, expensive and manual process. In this paper, we describe TECUS: a commercial system designed and deployed for contract understanding and used by a wide range of enterprise users for the past few years. We reflect on the challenges and design decisions when building TECUS. We also summarize the data science life cycle of TECUS and share lessons learned.