Tien-Dat Nguyen
Also published as: Tien Dat Nguyen
2026
Towards Pedagogically Aligned LLM Tutors for Math Mistake Remediation
Kseniia Petukhova | Tien Dat Nguyen | Ekaterina Kochmar
Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2026)
Kseniia Petukhova | Tien Dat Nguyen | Ekaterina Kochmar
Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2026)
Large language models have strong potential for use in intelligent tutoring systems, but they often fail to follow effective pedagogical strategies, such as guiding students without revealing final answers. We study the application of a two-stage alignment pipeline for math mistake remediation, combining supervised fine-tuning on tutoring dialogs with Direct Preference Optimization on synthetic preference pairs. We construct a dataset that integrates existing tutoring corpora with synthetic data generated along pedagogical dimensions, such as scaffolding and factuality, and study different input configurations that incorporate solution correctness and gold answers. Experiments show that this approach improves both factual accuracy and pedagogical quality over base models and existing tutoring models. Human evaluation further indicates that our best model is competitive with a strong proprietary baseline, while providing additional benefits in terms of openness, transparency, and reproducibility. Our results highlight the effectiveness of preference-based pedagogical alignment, while also revealing challenges in reliably evaluating tutoring quality.
2025
Tdnguyen at CQs-Gen 2025: Adapt Large Language Models with Multi-Step Reasoning for Critical Questions Generation
Tien-Dat Nguyen | Duc-Vu Nguyen
Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop
Tien-Dat Nguyen | Duc-Vu Nguyen
Proceedings of the 12th Argument mining Workshop
This paper explores the generation of Critical Questions (CQs) from argumentative texts using multi-step reasoning techniques, specifically Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT) and Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT) prompting frameworks. CQs are essential for enhancing critical thinking and improving decision-making across various domains. Despite the promise of Large Language Models (LLMs) in this task, generating contextually relevant and logically sound questions remains a challenge. Our experiments show that CoT-based prompting strategies, including Zero-shot and One-shot methods, significantly outperform baseline models in generating high-quality CQs. While ToT prompting offers a more flexible reasoning structure, it was less effective than CoT in this task. We suggest exploring more advanced or computationally intense multi-step reasoning techniques, as well as alternative tree structures for the ToT framework, to further improve CQs-Gen systems.