Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Text-to-SQL parsing, achieving remarkable success in static, single-turn query generation. However, a significant disparity remains between these academic benchmarks and real-world utility. In practical applications, such as financial auditing or business analytics, user intents are rarely static; they evolve dynamically through iterative refinement, necessitating not just information retrieval (SELECT) but continuous state manipulation (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE). To bridge this gap, we introduce DySQL-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate LLMs within a dynamic interaction framework. Unlike varying manual curation efforts, DySQL-Bench employs a two-stage automated synthesis pipeline: transforming raw relational schemas into hierarchical logic trees to generate user-database interactions, followed by a rigorous verify-and-refine protocol that ensures 100% distinct correctness via human expert validation. We further propose an interactive evaluation environment simulating a triadic workflow involving an LLM-simulated user, the agent under test, and an executable database system. Spanning 13 diverse domains with 1,072 complex tasks, our experiments reveal that current powerful models struggle in this realistic setting. Notably, GPT-4o achieves only 58.34% overall accuracy and a meager 23.81% on the strict Pass^5 metric, highlighting the substantial challenges DySQL-Bench poses for the future of database agents.

Training effective AI agents for real-world tool-use interactions requires data that faithfully captures the dynamics of human–agent collaboration. However, such data is scarce, and existing methods often resort to synthetic data generation. The inherently dynamic and complex nature of user–agent interactions makes ensuring data quality particularly challenging. Current verification approaches are typically entangled with the synthesis process itself, resulting in complicated implementations that undermine both reproducibility and scalability. To address this, we introduce Tool-Verifier-7B, a plug-and-play framework for data quality control in tool-use scenarios. Building on this verifier and our data synthesis strategy, we construct the Tool-Verify dataset, which contains 3,295 curated samples. To directly assess verifier performance, we further release Tool-V-Bench, a benchmark of 165 human-validated trajectories spanning diverse interaction complexities. Comprehensive experiments show that Tool-Verifier-7B surpasses Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct on Tool-V-Bench. Moreover, the Tool-Verify dataset achieves superior performance compared to the previous APIGen-MT dataset.

Large language models (LLMs) face a significant challenge due to the excessive computational and memory requirements of the commonly used Transformer architecture. While state space model (SSM) is a new type of foundational network architecture offering lower computational complexity, their performance has yet to fully rival that of Transformers. This paper introduces DenseSSM, a novel approach to enhance the flow of hidden information between layers in SSMs. By selectively integrating shallow-layer hidden states into deeper layers, DenseSSM retains fine-grained information crucial for the final output. This incremental improvement maintains the training parallelizability and inference efficiency of SSMs while significantly boosting performance. The proposed method is broadly applicable to various SSM types, including RetNet and Mamba, and DenseSSM achieves significant performance improvements on public benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness and versatility.

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on various NLP tasks, yet their potential in more challenging task like finance, has not been fully explored. In this paper, we present CFinBench: a meticulously crafted, the most comprehensive evaluation benchmark to date, for assessing the financial knowledge of LLMs under Chinese context. In practice, to better align with the career trajectory of Chinese financial practitioners, we build a systematic evaluation from 4 first-level categories: (1) Financial Subject: whether LLMs can memorize the necessary basic knowledge of financial subjects, such as economics, statistics and auditing. (2) Financial Qualification: whether LLMs can obtain the needed financial qualified certifications, such as certified public accountant, securities qualification and banking qualification. (3) Financial Practice: whether LLMs can fulfill the practical financial jobs, such as tax consultant, junior accountant and securities analyst. (4) Financial Law: whether LLMs can meet the requirement of financial laws and regulations, such as tax law, insurance law and economic law. CFinBench comprises 99,100 questions spanning 43 second-level categories with 3 question types: single-choice, multiple-choice and judgment. We conduct extensive experiments on a wide spectrum of representative LLMs with various model size on CFinBench. The results show that GPT4 and some Chinese-oriented models lead the benchmark, with the highest average accuracy being 66.02%, highlighting the challenge presented by CFinBench. All the data and evaluation code are open sourced at https://cfinbench.github.io/