Syllogistic reasoning serves as a critical diagnostic for evaluating whether Large Language Models (LLMs) perform genuine logical inference or rely on semantic shortcuts. SemEval-2026 task 11 explores "content effects"—where model judgments are biased by world knowledge rather than logical form. Recent work has illustrated that LLM optimization techniques have provided substantial performance gains in mitigating content effect. To contribute to this research domain, this paper performs a systematic study of different intervention strategies: zero-shot chain of thought, symbolic representation, activation-steering, and supervised fine-tuning along with prompting optimization during inference. We achieved the best performance with our largest model (Phi-4 14B) by fine-tuning with chain of thought distillation, symbolic abstractions and LLM as optimizer prompting (FTOptim) evaluated on the held-out split derived from the training data. This approach achieved the highest Combined Smooth Score (CSS) of 31.16. Additionally, Llama 3.1 provided noteworthy performance with 31.01 CSS under the same FTOptim approach, indicating the performance gain was LLM-agnostic.