We present SemEval-2026 Task 9, a shared task on online polarization detection, covering 22 languages and comprising over 110K annotated instances. Each data instance is multi-labeled with the presence of polarization, polarization type, and polarization manifestation. Participants were asked to predict labels in three subtasks: (1) detecting the presence of polarization, (2) identifying the type of polarization, and (3) recognizing the polarization manifestation. The three tasks attracted over 1,000 participants worldwide and more than 10k submissions on Codabench. We received final submissions from 67 teams and 69 system description papers. We report the baseline results and analyze the performance of the best-performing systems, highlighting the most common approaches and the most effective methods across different subtasks and languages. The dataset and other resources for this task are publicly available.

Online polarization poses a growing challenge for democratic discourse, yet most computational social science research remains monolingual, culturally narrow, or event-specific. We introduce POLAR, a multilingual, multicultural, and multi-event dataset with over 110K instances in 22 languages drawn from diverse online platforms and real-world events. Polarization is annotated along three axes, namely detection, type, and manifestation, using a variety of annotation platforms adapted to each cultural context. We conduct two main experiments: (1) fine-tuning six pretrained small language models; and (2) evaluating a range of open and closed large language models in few-shot and zero-shot settings. Results show that while most models perform well on binary polarization detection, they achieve substantially lower performance when predicting polarization types and manifestations. These findings highlight the complex, highly contextual nature of polarization and underscore the need for robust, adaptable approaches in NLP and computational social science. All resources will be released to support further research and effective mitigation of digital polarization globally.

Despite the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate coherent comparative answers, automatic comparative question answering (CQA) remains challenging due to the absence of standardized evaluation criteria and the high resource demands of manual assessment. To address these problems, this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework designed to assess the quality of CQA summaries using LLMs-as-a-Judge. We formulate 15 evaluation criteria for assessing comparative answers generated by various sources, including LLMs, human experts, and prior work. To capture a diverse range of comparative answers, LLM summaries were generated under various prompting scenarios. We evaluate the effectiveness of our framework using both human assessment and LLMs, demonstrating the consistency between automated and manual evaluations. Finally, we fine-tune Llama-3-8B-Instruct on a dataset generated from the best-performing CQA models in our evaluation.

Comparative Question Answering (CQA) lies at the intersection of Question Answering, Argument Mining, and Summarization. It poses unique challenges due to the inherently subjective nature of many questions and the need to integrate diverse perspectives. Although the CQA task can be addressed using recently emerged instruction-following Large Language Models (LLMs), challenges such as hallucinations in their outputs and the lack of transparent argument provenance remain significant limitations.To address these challenges, we construct a manually curated dataset comprising arguments annotated with their relevance. These arguments are further used to answer comparative questions, enabling precise traceability and faithfulness. Furthermore, we define explicit criteria for an “ideal” comparison and introduce a benchmark for evaluating the outputs of various Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models with respect to argument relevance. All code and data are publicly released to support further research.

We present Sense Clustering over Time (SCoT), a novel network-based tool for analysing lexical change. SCoT represents the meanings of a word as clusters of similar words. It visualises their formation, change, and demise. There are two main approaches to the exploration of dynamic networks: the discrete one compares a series of clustered graphs from separate points in time. The continuous one analyses the changes of one dynamic network over a time-span. SCoT offers a new hybrid solution. First, it aggregates time-stamped documents into intervals and calculates one sense graph per discrete interval. Then, it merges the static graphs to a new type of dynamic semantic neighbourhood graph over time. The resulting sense clusters offer uniquely detailed insights into lexical change over continuous intervals with model transparency and provenance. SCoT has been successfully used in a European study on the changing meaning of ‘crisis’.

Semantic frames are formal linguistic structures describing situations/actions/events, e.g. Commercial transfer of goods. Each frame provides a set of roles corresponding to the situation participants, e.g. Buyer and Goods, and lexical units (LUs) – words and phrases that can evoke this particular frame in texts, e.g. Sell. The scarcity of annotated resources hinders wider adoption of frame semantics across languages and domains. We investigate a simple yet effective method, lexical substitution with word representation models, to automatically expand a small set of frame-annotated sentences with new words for their respective roles and LUs. We evaluate the expansion quality using FrameNet. Contextualized models demonstrate overall superior performance compared to the non-contextualized ones on roles. However, the latter show comparable performance on the task of LU expansion.

We present our system for semantic frame induction that showed the best performance in Subtask B.1 and finished as the runner-up in Subtask A of the SemEval 2019 Task 2 on unsupervised semantic frame induction (Qasem-iZadeh et al., 2019). Our approach separates this task into two independent steps: verb clustering using word and their context embeddings and role labeling by combining these embeddings with syntactical features. A simple combination of these steps shows very competitive results and can be extended to process other datasets and languages.