Multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) in real-world scenarios is often challenged by dynamically missing modalities. Existing methods predominantly rely on deterministic imputation and rigid alignment, which compels the model to overfit noise in ambiguous regions while neglecting the decision shift induced by modality inertia. To address these issues, we propose a novel uncertainty-calibrated elastic alignment framework, termed EASE. Specifically, we employ probabilistic imputation to capture cross-modal ambiguity and leverage the estimated uncertainty to drive elastic alignment, thereby adaptively relaxing constraints in ambiguous regions to avoid rigid fitting. Meanwhile, we introduce cross-view predictive consistency constraints to unify discriminative logic across different modality views, stabilizing the decision boundary under modality degradation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EASE consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art baselines across multiple benchmarks, exhibiting exceptional robustness particularly under high missing-rate scenarios.

Recent advancements in large multimodal models (LMMs) have showcased impressive code generation capabilities, primarily evaluated through image-to-code benchmarks. However, these benchmarks are limited to specific visual programming scenarios where the logic reasoning and the multimodal understanding capacities are split apart. To fill this gap, we propose ScratchEval, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the visual programming reasoning ability of LMMs. ScratchEval is based on Scratch, a block-based visual programming language widely used in children’s programming education. By integrating visual elements and embedded programming logic, ScratchEval requires the model to process both visual information and code structure, thereby comprehensively evaluating its programming intent understanding ability. Our evaluation approach goes beyond the traditional image-to-code mapping and focuses on unified logical thinking and problem-solving abilities, providing a more comprehensive and challenging framework for evaluating the visual programming ability of LMMs. ScratchEval not only fills the gap in existing evaluation methods, but also provides new insights for the future development of LMMs in the field of visual programming.