Distilling multi-step reasoning abilities from large language models (LLMs) into compact student models remains challenging due to noisy rationales, hallucinated supervision, and static teacher–student interactions. Existing reasoning distillation methods, including mentor-based approaches, predominantly operate in an open-loop manner, implicitly assuming uniform teacher reliability and consequently propagating erroneous intermediate reasoning. We propose GateKD, a confidence-gated closed-loop distillation framework that enables robust reasoning transfer by treating the teacher as a dynamic gatekeeper rather than a static oracle. GateKD introduces three complementary mechanisms: (i) confidence-gated soft supervision that selectively distills reliable predictive signals, (ii) gated hidden-state evolution that aligns intermediate representations only when teacher confidence is high, and (iii) reliability-filtered attention distillation that preserves stable reasoning structures while suppressing noisy patterns. These components jointly form a closed feedback loop in which teacher confidence continuously modulates the distillation process, reducing hallucination transfer and stabilizing student reasoning. Extensive experiments across commonsense, logical, and symbolic reasoning benchmarks, using T5 and Flan-T5 backbones of varying sizes, demonstrate that GateKD consistently outperforms strong open-loop distillation baselines. Notably, GateKD yields substantial gains in logical and symbolic reasoning, remains robust under low-resource distillation settings, and shows clear performance degradation when any gating component is removed. Our results highlight that confidence-gated closed-loop supervision is critical for building reliable and scalable small reasoning models.

Political stance detection in low-resource and culturally complex settings poses a critical challenge for large language models (LLMs). In the Thai political landscape—rich with indirect expressions, polarized figures, and sentiment-stance entanglement—LLMs often exhibit systematic biases, including sentiment leakage and entity favoritism. These biases not only compromise model fairness but also degrade predictive reliability in real-world applications. We introduce ThaiFACTUAL, a lightweight, model-agnostic calibration framework that mitigates political bias without fine-tuning LLMs. ThaiFACTUAL combines counterfactual data augmentation with rationale-based supervision to disentangle sentiment from stance and neutralize political preferences. We curate and release the first high-quality Thai political stance dataset with stance, sentiment, rationale, and bias markers across diverse political entities and events. Our results show that ThaiFACTUAL substantially reduces spurious correlations, improves zero-shot generalization, and enhances fairness across multiple LLMs. This work underscores the need for culturally grounded bias mitigation and offers a scalable blueprint for debiasing LLMs in politically sensitive, underrepresented languages.