Large reasoning language models such as OpenAI-o1 and Deepseek-R1 have recently attracted widespread attention due to their impressive task-solving abilities. However, the enormous model size and the generation of lengthy thought chains introduce significant reasoning costs and response latency. Existing methods for efficient reasoning mainly focus on reducing the number of model parameters or shortening the chain-of-thought length. In this paper, we introduce Speculative Chain-of-Thought (SCoT), which reduces reasoning latency from another perspective by accelerated average reasoning speed through large and small model collaboration. SCoT conducts thought-level drafting using a lightweight draft model. Then it selects the best CoT draft and corrects the error cases with the target model. The proposed thinking behavior alignment improves the efficiency of drafting and the draft selection strategy maintains the prediction accuracy of the target model for complex tasks. Experimental results on GSM8K, MATH, GaoKao, CollegeMath and Olympiad datasets show that SCoT reduces reasoning latency by 48%∼66% and 21%∼49% for Deepseek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B and Deepseek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B while achieving near-target-model-level performance.

Long-context models(LCMs) have witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, facilitating real-world tasks like long-document QA. The success of LCMs is founded on the hypothesis that the model demonstrates strong fidelity, enabling it to respond based on the provided long context rather than relying solely on the intrinsic knowledge acquired during pre-training. Yet, in this paper, we find that open-sourced LCMs are not as faithful as expected. We introduce L-CiteEval, an out-of-the-box suite that can assess both generation quality and fidelity in long-context understanding tasks. It covers 11 tasks with context lengths ranging from 8K to 48K and a corresponding automatic evaluation pipeline. Evaluation of 11 cutting-edge closed-source and open-source LCMs indicates that, while there are minor differences in their generation, open-source models significantly lag behind closed-source counterparts in terms of fidelity. Furthermore, we analyze the benefits of citation generation for LCMs from both the perspective of explicit model output and the internal attention mechanism.