Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) enable interpretability research by decomposing entangled model activations into monosemantic features. However, under what circumstances SAEs derive most fine-grained latent features for safety—a low-frequency concept domain—remains unexplored. Two key challenges exist: identifying SAEs with the greatest potential for generating safety domain-specific features, and the prohibitively high cost of detailed feature explanation. In this paper, we propose **Safe-SAIL**, a unified framework for interpreting SAE features in safety-critical domains to advance mechanistic understanding of large language models. Safe-SAIL introduces a pre-explanation evaluation metric to efficiently identify SAEs with strong safety domain-specific interpretability, and reduces interpretation cost by 55% through a segment-level simulation strategy. Building on Safe-SAIL, we train a comprehensive suite of SAEs with human-readable explanations and systematic evaluations for 1,758 safety-related features spanning four domains: pornography, politics, violence, and terror. Using this resource, we conduct empirical analyses and provide insights on the effectiveness of Safe-SAIL for risk feature identification and how safety-critical entities and concepts are encoded across model layers. All models, explanations, and tools are publicly released in an open-source toolkit at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Safe-SAIL/.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a powerful technique for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, effectively aligning LLMs with diverse human preferences remains a significant challenge, particularly when they are conflict. To address this issue, we frame human value alignment as a multi-objective optimization problem, aiming to maximize a set of potentially conflicting objectives. We introduce Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization (GAPO), a novel fine-tuning paradigm that employs multiple-gradient descent to align LLMs with diverse preference distributions. GAPO adaptively rescales the gradients for each objective to determine an update direction that optimally balances the trade-offs between objectives. Additionally, we introduce P-GAPO, which incorporates user preferences across different objectives and achieves Pareto solutions that better align with the user’s specific needs.

Free-text explanations are crucial for enhancing the interpretability of AI models. However, training models to generate high-quality free-text explanations is challenging, primarily due to the requirement of a substantial amount of human-written explanations, which can be expensive. Recently, Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GPT-4 have made remarkable progress in various NLP tasks while also providing explanations alongside their answers. Leveraging LLMs for data labeling offers a more cost-effective alternative. However, a key concern arises from the fact that the answers provided by LLMs are not entirely accurate, potentially introducing noise to both task outputs and explanation generation. To remedy this, we propose a new mechanism, Distillation with Explanations from LLMs. we observe that despite the incorrectness in LLMs-generated answers, their explanations are consistent with their answers. Leveraging this consistency, our method combines the ground truth labels and answers-explanations generated by LLMs, to simultaneously generate more accurate answers and the corresponding free-text explanations. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves improved predictive performance and also generates explanations that exhibit greater alignment with the model’s task outputs.