Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as interactive social agents, yet their ability to maintain coherent and authentic persona-level role-playing remains limited, particularly in realistic social scenarios. Existing research predominantly focuses on character-level settings and relies on static evaluation formats, failing to capture the complexity of everyday social interactions. In this work, we present PersonaArena, a dynamic simulation framework for evaluating and improving persona-level role-playing in LLMs. PersonaArena leverages a large, filtered corpus of user-generated social content to construct a nuanced persona bank, and elicits multi-turn, context-rich interactions within simulated social environments. Our framework features a multi-agent debating judge for holistic and unbiased assessment. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that PersonaArena enables rigorous evaluation and enhancement of LLMs’ role-playing capabilities, advancing the development of more authentic and socially adept AI agents. Our codes and long appendix are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PersonaArena-B323/.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in role-play scenarios, but their safety implications remain under-characterized. We present an explanatory framework grounded in Bandura’s Moral Disengagement theory and introduce a diagnostic benchmark (MD-Trace) for role-play jailbreaks. In our experiments, role-play improves safety behavior for benign personas while increasing unsafe compliance for malicious ones. We observe a Knowing-but-Doing failure in which models recognize safety risks in their thinking traces yet proceed to comply with harmful requests. Mechanism analysis suggests that Moral Justification is dominant, with Disregard of Consequences appearing as a secondary pattern. We compare multiple attack and defense methods and find that the diagnosis aligns with observed failure modes. Finally, we propose MD-Shield, an introspection-based defense that reduces attack success while maintaining Role Fidelity. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/lavapapa/MoralJustify/.

Whether Large Language Models (LLMs) develop coherent internal world models remains a core debate. While conventional Next-Token Prediction (NTP) focuses on one-step-ahead supervision, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) has shown promise in learning more structured representations. In this work, we provide a theoretical perspective analyzing the gradient inductive bias of MTP, supported by empirical evidence, showing that MTP promotes the convergence toward internal belief states by inducing representational contractivity via gradient coupling. However, we reveal that standard MTP often suffers from structural hallucinations, where discrete token supervision encourages illegal shortcuts in latent space that violate environmental constraints. To address this, we propose a novel method **Latent Semantic Enhancement MTP (LSE-MTP)**, which anchors predictions to ground-truth hidden state trajectories. Experiments on synthetic graphs and real-world Manhattan Taxi Ride show that LSE-MTP effectively bridges the gap between discrete tokens and continuous state representations, enhancing representation alignment, reducing structural hallucinations, and improving robustness to perturbations.

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit significant potential in complex software engineering tasks, however, their fault localization capabilities within repository are constrained by inherent limitations in max context length. Although Test-Time Scaling (TTS) can generate multiple candidate solutions, traditional selection strategies often fail to identify the optimal one. To solve this problem, we introduces Hierarchical Localization Reward Model (HiLoRM), which specifically designed to evaluate and select the most accurate fault localization candidates (at file, function, and line levels) from the multiple sampled outputs of LLMs, thereby enhancing localization accuracy. Furthermore, we constructed the HiFL-44k dataset, comprising approximately 44,000 fault localization instances, to train HiLoRM. Experimental results demonstrate that on the SWE-Bench-Lite dataset, HiLoRM improves the final line-level localization recall by 12% compared to a baseline model that does not use a reward model. Concurrently, HiLoRM exhibits a strong capability to evaluate predictions from larger LLMs (e.g., 32B parameters) and demonstrates transferability and generalization potential when applied to other fault localization methods. This work provides an effective methodology and an accessible model to significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of LLMs for repository-level fault localization. Our codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/SZU-ZJW/HiFL-Method.

Role-playing capabilities in large language models (LLMs) often lack cognitive consistency in complex scenarios that require deep understanding and coherent reasoning. While recent reasoning models excel in math and coding tasks, they show limited effectiveness in open-ended role-playing scenarios. We introduce R-CHAR (Role-Consistent Hierarchical Adaptive Reasoning), a metacognition-driven framework that enhances role-playing performance through guided thinking trajectories synthesis and adaptive evaluation. Our approach demonstrates that concise thinking processes can achieve superior performance efficiently compared to elaborate reasoning chains in role-playing social intelligence tasks, outperforming existing specialized models. Experimental results on the SocialBench benchmark show significant and stable performance improvements across varying scenario complexities, showing particular strength in long-context comprehension (from 34.64% to 68.59%) and group-level social interactions. Our work advances the development of cognitively consistent role-playing systems, bridging the gap between surface-level mimicry and authentic character simulation.