Ethan Seefried
2026
REFSafE: A RAG-Enabled Framework for Predictive Risk Analysis and Automated Safety Report Generation in Mission-Critical Environments
Sanjay Das | Ran Elgedawy | Ethan Seefried | Ryan A. Burchfield | Gavin Wiggins | Dana Hewit | Sudarshan Srinivasan | Prasanna Balaprakash | Robert M. Patton | Todd Thomas | Tirthankar Ghosal
Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Multilingual Report Generation via Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG4Reports 2026)
Sanjay Das | Ran Elgedawy | Ethan Seefried | Ryan A. Burchfield | Gavin Wiggins | Dana Hewit | Sudarshan Srinivasan | Prasanna Balaprakash | Robert M. Patton | Todd Thomas | Tirthankar Ghosal
Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Multilingual Report Generation via Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG4Reports 2026)
Operational safety in mission-critical environments requires AI systems that are accurate, interpretable, and resistant to hallucination. We present an agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework, REFSafe, for grounded hazard analysis and automated safety report generation. The system integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with structured operational data, historical incident repositories, policy documents, and external authoritative sources. Through iterative agentic reasoning, the framework retrieves, verifies, and synthesizes evidence prior to generation, enforcing citation-backed outputs with explicit source attribution (documents, links, and prior events) to ensure traceability and trust.To mitigate hallucinations and unsupported claims, all risk assessments and forecasts are constrained to retrieved evidence, with confidence signals derived from retrieval relevance and source consistency. A transparent pipeline enables subject matter experts (SMEs) to validate predictions, and provide structured feedback, forming a continuous performance calibration loop. Preliminary deployment demonstrates improved reliability in hazard detection and safety/vulnerability report generation. This work advances trustworthy, evidence-grounded AI for predictive safety intelligence in mission-critical operations.
2025
Overview of TRACS: the Telescope Reference and Astronomy Categorization Dataset & Shared Task
Felix Grezes | Jennifer Lynn Bartlett | Kelly Lockhart | Alberto Accomazzi | Ethan Seefried | Anjali Pandiri | Tirthankar Ghosal
Proceedings of the Third Workshop for Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Publications
Felix Grezes | Jennifer Lynn Bartlett | Kelly Lockhart | Alberto Accomazzi | Ethan Seefried | Anjali Pandiri | Tirthankar Ghosal
Proceedings of the Third Workshop for Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Publications
To evaluate the scientific influence of observational facilities, astronomers examine the body of publications that have utilized data from those facilities. This depends on curated bibliographies that annotate and connect data products to the corresponding literature, enabling bibliometric analyses to quantify data impact. Compiling such bibliographies is a demanding process that requires expert curators to scan the literature for relevant names, acronyms, and identifiers, and then to determine whether and how specific observations contributed to each publication. These bibliographies have value beyond impact assessment: for research scientists, explicit links between data and literature form an essential pathway for discovering and accessing data. Accordingly, by building on the work of librarians and archivists, telescope bibliographies can be repurposed to directly support scientific inquiry. In this context, we present the Telescope Reference and Astronomy Categorization Shared task (TRACS) and its accompanying dataset, which comprises more than 89,000 publicly available English-language texts drawn from space telescope bibliographies. These texts are labeled according to a new, compact taxonomy developed in consultation with experienced bibliographers.