We present the results and the main findings of SemEval-2026 Task 13: Detecting Machine-Generated Code with Multiple Programming Languages, Generators, and Application Scenarios. Our task featured three subtasks. Subtask A is a binary classification taskthat determines whether a given code snippet is written by a human or generated by a machine. This subtask focuses on the development of robust methods for AI-generated code identification, since the training and the test data splits have code in different languages and cover diverse usage domains. Subtask B focuses on defining synthetic code smells and requires participants to identify the provenance of the generator family of the model that generated the given code snippet. Subtask C aims at more fine-grained attribution of the written code: whether it was fully AI-generated, fully human-written, produced in human-AI collaboration (hybrid) or by a model tuned or prompted to give human-like code. The task attracted a large number of team members: subtask A (81), subtask B (34), and subtask C (32). In this study, we present the task, analyze the results and discuss the submissions of the system and the methods they used.

Reasoning is a core capability of large language models (LLMs), yet how multi-step reasoning is learned and executed remains unclear. We study this question in a controlled cellular-automata (1dCA) framework that excludes memorization by using disjoint training and test rules. Given a short state sequence, the model is required to infer the hidden local rule and then chain it to predict multiple future steps. Our evaluation shows that LLMs largely fail to reliably solve a natural-language proxy of the proposed task. We find that most neural architectures trained from scratch can learn rule inference and achieve high next-step accuracy, but performance drops sharply as the required number of intermediate reasoning steps increases. Experiments show that increasing model depth is crucial, and extending effective depth via recurrence, memory, or test-time compute improves results but remains bounded. Code is available on github: https://github.com/RodkinIvan/associative-recurrent-memory-transformer/tree/ACT.

News outlets shape public opinion on a scale, which makes automated detection of political bias and factuality essential. Yet, the field still lacks unified resources, comprehensive evaluations in diverse approaches, and systematic analyzes of the representations and fusion strategies that matter the most, especially under label sparsity and dataset diversity. In addition, there is little empirical work that reports broad observation driven findings about what consistently works, what fails, and why. We address these gaps with four contributions: (i) MBFC-2025, a large-scale label set that covers ~2,600 outlets from Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC); (ii) multi-view representations for ACL-2020 ~900 outlets and MBFC-2025, spanning Alexa graphs, hyperlink graphs, LLM-derived graphs, articles, and Wikipedia descriptions; (iii) systematic evaluation and analysis of embedding views and fusion strategies, including an RL-based fusion variant; and (iv) extensive experiments that achieve state-of-the-art results on ACL-2020 and establish strong benchmarks on MBFC-2025.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of generating functional source code, raising concerns about authorship, accountability, and security. While detecting AI-generated code is critical, existing datasets and benchmarks are narrow, typically limited to binary human–machine classification under in-distribution settings. To bridge this gap, we introduce AICD Bench, the most comprehensive benchmark for AI-generated code detection. It spans 2M examples, 77 models across 11 families, and 9 programming languages, including recent reasoning models. Beyond scale, AICD Bench introduces three realistic detection tasks: (i) Robust Binary Classification under distribution shifts in language and domain, (ii) Model Family Attribution, grouping generators by architectural lineage, and (iii) Fine-Grained Human–Machine Classification across human, machine, hybrid, and adversarial code. Extensive evaluation on neural and classical detectors shows that performance remains far below practical usability, particularly under distribution shift and for hybrid or adversarial code. We release AICD Bench as a unified, challenging evaluation suite to drive the next generation of robust approaches for AI-generated code detection. The data and the code are available at https://huggingface.co/AICD-bench.

Multi-step symbolic reasoning is essential for robust financial analysis; yet, current benchmarks largely overlook this capability. Existing datasets such as FinQA and ConvFinQA emphasize final numerical answers while neglecting the intermediate reasoning steps required for transparency and verification. To address this gap, we introduce FinChain, the first benchmark specifically designed for verifiable Chain-of-Thought evaluation in finance. FinChain spans 58 topics across 12 financial domains, each represented by parameterized symbolic templates with executable Python code that enable fully machine-verifiable reasoning and scalable, contamination-free data generation.To assess reasoning capacity, we propose ChainEval, a dynamic alignment measure that jointly evaluates both the final-answer correctness and the step-level reasoning consistency. Our evaluation of 26 leading LLMs reveals that even frontier LLMs exhibit clear limitations in symbolic financial reasoning, while domain-adapted and math-enhanced fine-tuned models can substantially narrow this gap.Overall, FinChain exposes persistent weaknesses in multi-step financial reasoning and provides a foundation for developing trustworthy, interpretable, and verifiable financial AI. This project is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/finchain.git.

Stereotype bias in language models has been widely examined in English, but remains largely understudied in bilingual contexts where multiple linguistic and cultural systems interact. This gap is especially important in regions where language use reflects complex historical and sociopolitical influences. In this work, we focus on Kazakhstan, a bilingual society where Kazakh, a low-resource Turkic language, and Russian, a high-resource Slavic language, are both actively used and frequently code-mixed in everyday communication. We introduce Aqbileq, a high-quality, human-verified dataset consisting of 5,634 stereotype-bearing statements in Kazakh, Russian, and code-mixed forms, covering six culturally salient domains. We evaluate both multilingual and Kazakh-specific language models using perplexity-based scoring and pretraining simulations, and find that stereotype bias is most pronounced in code-mixed inputs. Our results highlight the limitations of existing evaluation frameworks and emphasize the need for culturally grounded, linguistically inclusive benchmarks to better assess and mitigate bias in language models.

Translating cultural content poses challenges for machine translation systems due to the differences in conceptualizations between cultures, where language alone may fail to convey sufficient context to capture region-specific meanings. In this work, we investigate whether images can act as cultural context in multimodal translation. We introduce CaMMT, a human-curated benchmark of over 5,800 triples of images along with parallel captions in English and regional languages. Using this dataset, we evaluate five Vision Language Models (VLMs) in text-only and text+image settings. Through automatic and human evaluations, we find that visual context generally improves translation quality, especially in handling Culturally-Specific Items (CSIs), disambiguation, and correct gender marking. By releasing CaMMT, our objective is to support broader efforts to build and evaluate multimodal translation systems that are better aligned with cultural nuance and regional variations.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation, automating programming with remarkable efficiency. However, this has had important consequences for programming skills, ethics, and assessment integrity, thus making the detection of LLM-generated code essential for maintaining accountability and standards. While, there has been some previous research on this problem, it generally lacks domain coverage and robustness, and only covers a small number of programming languages. Here, we aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we propose a framework capable of distinguishing between human-written and LLM-generated program code across multiple programming languages, code generators, and domains. We use a large-scale dataset from renowned platforms and LLM-based code generators, alongside applying rigorous data quality checks, feature engineering, and comparative analysis of traditional machine learning models, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and LLMs for code detection. We perform an evaluation on out-of-domain scenarios, such as detecting authorship and hybrid authorship of generated code and generalizing to unseen models, domains, and programming languages. Our extensive experiments show that our framework effectively distinguishes human-written from LLM-generated program code, setting a new benchmark for the task.

Large language models (LLMs) are known to have the potential to generate harmful content, posing risks to users. While significant progress has been made in developing taxonomies for LLM risks and safety evaluation prompts, most studies have focused on monolingual contexts, primarily in English. However, language- and region-specific risks in bilingual contexts are often overlooked, and core findings can diverge from those in monolingual settings. In this paper, we introduce Qorǵau, a novel dataset specifically designed for safety evaluation in Kazakh and Russian, reflecting the unique bilingual context in Kazakhstan, where both Kazakh (a low-resource language) and Russian (a high-resource language) are spoken. Experiments with both multilingual and language-specific LLMs reveal notable differences in safety performance, emphasizing the need for tailored, region-specific datasets to ensure the responsible and safe deployment of LLMs in countries like Kazakhstan. Warning: this paper contains example data that may be offensive, harmful, or biased.

We present DroidCollection, the most extensive open data suite for training and evaluating machine-generated code detectors, comprising over a million code samples, seven programming languages, outputs from 43 coding models, and three real-world coding domains. Alongside fully AI-generated examples, our collection includes human-AI co-authored code, as well as adversarial examples explicitly crafted to evade detection. Subsequently, we develop DroidDetect, a suite of encoder-only detectors trained using a multi-task objective over DroidCollection. Our experiments show that existing detectors’ performance fails to generalise to diverse coding domains and programming languages outside of their narrow training data. We further demonstrate that while most detectors are easily compromised by humanising the output distributions using superficial prompting and alignment approaches, this problem can be easily amended by training on a small number of adversarial examples. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of metric learning and uncertainty-based resampling as way to enhance detector training on possibly noisy distributions.

Instruction tuning in low-resource languages remains underexplored due to limited text data, particularly in government and cultural domains. To address this, we introduce and open-source a large-scale (10,600 samples) instruction-following (IFT) dataset, covering key institutional and cultural knowledge relevant to Kazakhstan. Our dataset enhances LLMs’ understanding of procedural, legal, and structural governance topics. We employ LLM-assisted data generation, comparing open-weight and closed-weight models for dataset construction, and select GPT-4o as the backbone. Each entity of our dataset undergoes full manual verification to ensure high quality. We also show that fine-tuning Qwen, Falcon, and Gemma on our dataset leads to consistent performance improvements in both multiple-choice and generative tasks, demonstrating the potential of LLM-assisted instruction tuning for low-resource languages.