Asynchronous psychological counseling (APC) represents a crucial mental health service modality that transcends temporal and spatial constraints. However, its development faces significant data scarcity challenges: due to stringent privacy protection requirements and professional ethical considerations, direct collection of conversational data from authentic APC scenarios is virtually impossible. To address this challenge, we design a self-optimizing multi-agent framework for counseling dialogue generation, CFlowPsy, which utilizes a small amount of real anonymized counseling cases as seed data to synthesize diverse problem-solving-oriented APC conversations through large language models. Specifically, the framework employs a Persona-Flow module to continuously track and update clients’ basic information, real-time emotions, and counseling progress, providing dynamic personalized analytical support for counselors and enabling self-optimization of generated dialogues. Simultaneously, the framework ensures that generated interventions contain explicit reasoning processes, demonstrating clear psychological analysis and logic, thereby enhancing the accuracy and consistency of responses. Under this framework, we develop the first Chinese APC dataset, CFlowPsyD, comprising 1,700 high-quality extended conversations. Extensive experiments and human evaluations confirm that the proposed CFlowPsyD dataset successfully simulates human-like APC processes.

Large Reason Models (LRMs) extend long reasoning process to solve complex tasks. However, due to the lack of fine-grained control, they often suffer from overthinking and erroneous reasoning problems, risking accuracy loss. To address this issue, we introduce Reasoning Direction Steering (RDS) to enable fine-grained control over LRMs’ reasoning behaviors by aligning reasoning trajectories with specific cognitive patterns. We develop a simple yet effective paradigm, Thinking Intervention, which explores two key dimensions - intervention positions and intervention styles - to achieve integration intervention throughout model reasoning processes. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we conduct comprehensive experiments on multi-hop question answering tasks using state-of-the-art LRMs, including Qwen3-Series and R1-Series models. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of Thinking Intervention with 9.4% average improvement on R1-Series models and 1.9% improvement on Qwen3-Series models.