Existing causal datasets primarily focus on the commonsense domain, where the questions mainly involve simple, single-hop direct causal relationships. When models possess the corresponding knowledge, even if they cannot understand the causal relationships, they can directly arrive at the correct answers through knowledge matching. However, LLMs often perform poorly when answering questions with complex causal structures and domain-specific expertise. To address the above challenges, we propose MDC-Bench, a multidisciplinary causal evaluation benchmark. MDC-Bench adopts a three-level causal framework consisting of 4 core causal tasks, while its sample content covers 7 representative disciplines and diverse causal structures. In view of the limited coverage of multidisciplinary knowledge during the pre-training phase, the model cannot answer questions relying on knowledge matching. The diverse causal structures force the models to grasp the internal causal logic. We also increase the task complexity through methods such as compound causal operations, aiming to enhance the discriminability among models. MDC-Bench achieves the improvement in terms of domain specialization, structural diversity, and task complexity. Through extensive evaluation, we observe that even the advanced models have substantial room for improvement. MDC-Bench not only establishes a standardized baseline for causal research but also provides valuable insights for the applying LLMs in multiple domains.

Mathematical reasoning has been challenging for large language models (LLMs), and the introduction of step-by-step Chain-of-Thought (CoT) inference has significantly advanced the mathematical capabilities of LLMs. However, current approaches either necessitate extensive inference datasets for training or depend on few-shot methods that frequently compromise computational accuracy. To address these fundamental limitations, we propose Step Guided Reasoning, a novel training-free adaptation framework that efficiently equips general-purpose pre-trained language models with enhanced mathematical reasoning capabilities. In this approach, LLMs reflect on small reasoning steps, similar to how humans deliberate and focus attention on what to do next. By incorporating this reflective process into the inference stage, LLMs can effectively guide their reasoning from one step to the next. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the significant effect of Step Guided Reasoning in enhancing mathematical performance in state-of-the-art language models – Qwen2-72B-Instruct outperforms its math-specific counterpart, Qwen2.5-72B-Math-Instruct, on MMLU-STEM with a score of 90.9%, compared to 87.3%. The average scores of Qwen2-7B-Instruct and Qwen2-72B-Instruct increase from 27.1% to 36. 3% and from 36. 5% to 47.4% in the math domain, respectively.