Bogdan Grecu
2026
TinyAttack: Exploring Stylistic Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models
Mamta Mamta | Bogdan Grecu | Oana Cocarascu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Mamta Mamta | Bogdan Grecu | Oana Cocarascu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive results in natural language processing (NLP) tasks, however, their brittleness against subtle input perturbations continues to pose a significant challenge. Existing research on robustness has predominantly focused on standard text-based perturbations and the use of invisible characters and homoglyphs, while overlooking the impact of stylized characters increasingly prevalent on social media. To address this, we propose TinyAttack, a novel adversarial attack framework designed to exploit vulnerabilities in LLMs through Unicode-based stylistic transformations. TinyAttack utilises five Unicode variants to modify the visual rendering of text without altering its underlying semantic or syntactic structure. Our comprehensive evaluation on both open-source (Llama, Mistral, Gemma, Qwen) and closed-source LLMs (Gemini, GPT) demonstrates their susceptibility to these stylized inputs, with performance drops ranging from 29-92% and 6-88.5%, respectively, across all tasks.Our code is available at https://github.com/TRAI-group/TinyAttack.
Topic-Guided Prompting for Argument Stance Classification
Bogdan Grecu | Oana Cocarascu
Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Argument Mining and Reasoning
Bogdan Grecu | Oana Cocarascu
Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Argument Mining and Reasoning
Stance classification is a core task in argument mining and subjectivity analysis, crucial for understanding public discourse and opinion dynamics on social media. Despite their impressive few-shot capabilities, Large Language Models (LLMs) remain sensitive to prompt construction, including the selection and ordering of in-context examples. In this paper, we propose a Topic-Guided prompting method for argument stance classification that dynamically integrates topic-specific information into the few-shot context. We evaluate our method on five LLMs across three datasets spanning formal debates and user-generated online comments. Our extensive evaluation shows that our proposed Topic-Guided prompting outperforms standard few-shot prompting and state-of-the-art example selection strategies. Further analysis indicates that our method reduces the bias towards the ’support’ class observed in several models, resulting in more balanced predictions across stances and thus a more robust approach to stance classification.