@inproceedings{djamai-etal-2026-namaa,
    title = "{NAMAA} at {S}em{E}val-2026 Task 9: Comparing Generative, Retrieval-Augmented, and Discriminative Methods for {A}rabic Online Polarization Detection and Type Classification",
    author = "Djamai, Abdelbasset  and
      Al-Madi, Sahara  and
      Al-Zaid, Norah  and
      Al Jallad, Khloud  and
      Azim, Mona",
    editor = "Kochmar, Ekaterina  and
      Ghosh, Debanjan  and
      North, Kai  and
      Komachi, Mamoru",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {S}emantic {E}valuation (2026)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, USA",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.semeval-1.439/",
    pages = "3562--3590",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-414-9",
    abstract = "Detecting polarization in online discourse is important for understanding social fragmentation , yet it remains difficult for Arabic due to dialect variation, informal writing, and implicit framing. In this paper, we study Arabic polarization modeling in the SemEval-2026 Task 9 (POLAR) setting, focusing on polarization detection (ST1) and polarization type classification (ST2). We compare three approaches: encoder fine-tuning, zero-shot prompting, and retrieval-augmented in-context learning (RAG-ICL), across six Arabic encoders and different LLMs. For ST1, RAG-ICL with Gemma-3-27b-it achieves the best result (test macro F1 = 0.83), while remaining competitive with the best fine-tuned encoder (0.82), and substantially outperforming zero-shot prompting. For ST2, a pipeline that first applies the best ST1 encoder as a hard filter and then performs RAG-ICL achieves a macro F1 = 0.62. Prompt-language effects are model-and task-dependent, with some settings doing better with English prompts and others with Arabic prompts. Chain-of-thought, self-refinement, and contrastive prompting do not outperform standard RAG-ICL."
}