@inproceedings{bhattacharjee-etal-2026-argonauts,
    title = "The Argonauts at {S}em{E}val 2026 Task 6: Large Language Models for Response Clarity Classification: Prompting, Fine-Tuning, and Data-Centric Approaches",
    author = "Bhattacharjee, Sajib  and
      Mahmud, Sha Newaz  and
      Hossan, Md. Refaj  and
      Ahmed, Kawsar  and
      Hoque, Mohammed Moshiul",
    editor = "Kochmar, Ekaterina  and
      Ghosh, Debanjan  and
      North, Kai  and
      Komachi, Mamoru",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {S}emantic {E}valuation (2026)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, USA",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.semeval-1.344/",
    pages = "2729--2743",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-414-9",
    abstract = "Detecting equivocation is essential, as indirect or evasive responses can shape public perception, influence political narratives, and undermine transparency in democratic discourse. To address the challenge of detecting evasive political responses on digital platforms, participation in the CLARITY SemEval-2026 Task was undertaken, which focuses on (i) clarity-level classification and (ii) fine-grained evasion-type classification in political question-answer contexts. This study introduces a data-centric framework that systematically examines the effects of class distribution and refinement strategies on the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). A distribution-aware, LLM-augmented dataset was constructed by selectively paraphrasing minority-class instances to enhance class balance, and its performance was benchmarked against full, rebalanced, and undersampled training configurations. To comprehensively assess the proposed method, Qwen3-14B, Phi-4, Gemma-2 9B, and Mistral 7B were evaluated in in-context learning (ICL) settings (zero-shot and few-shot) and with LoRA fine-tuning. Experimental results indicate that fine-tuning Phi-4 with class rebalancing yields strong performance, achieving 74.77{\%} on Subtask-1 and 51.55{\%} on Subtask-2. Consequently, the system ranked 21st in Subtask-1 and 22nd in Subtask-2 on the official evaluation leaderboard."
}