Not Worth Mentioning? A Pilot Study on Salient Proposition Annotation

Amir Zeldes, Katherine Conhaim, Lauren Levine


Abstract
Despite a long tradition of work on extractive summarization, which by nature aims to recover the most important propositions in a text, little work has been done on operationalizing graded proposition salience in naturally occurring data. In this paper, we adopt graded summarization-based salience as a metric from previous work on Salient Entity Extraction (SEE) and adapt it to quantify proposition salience. We define the annotation task, apply it to a small multi-genre dataset, evaluate agreement and carry out a preliminary study of the relationship between our metric and notions of discourse unit centrality in discourse parsing following Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST).
Anthology ID:
2026.law-main.14
Volume:
Proceedings of the 20th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW XX)
Month:
July
Year:
2026
Address:
San Diego, California, USA
Editors:
Yang Janet Liu, Luke Gessler
Venues:
LAW | WS
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
178–186
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.law-main.14/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Amir Zeldes, Katherine Conhaim, and Lauren Levine. 2026. Not Worth Mentioning? A Pilot Study on Salient Proposition Annotation. In Proceedings of the 20th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW XX), pages 178–186, San Diego, California, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Not Worth Mentioning? A Pilot Study on Salient Proposition Annotation (Zeldes et al., LAW 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.law-main.14.pdf