Contrastive Decoding Mitigates Score Range Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge

Yoshinari Fujinuma


Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are commonly used as evaluators in various applications, but the reliability of the outcomes remains a challenge. One such challenge is using LLMs-as-judges for direct assessment, i.e., assigning scores from a specified range without any references. Using summarization as our primary testbed, we first show that this challenge stems from LLM judge outputs being associated with score range bias, i.e., LLM judge outputs are highly sensitive to pre-defined score ranges. We also show that similar biases exist among models from the same family. We then mitigate this bias through contrastive decoding, achieving up to 11.7% relative improvement in Spearman correlation with human judgments, averaged across score ranges.
Anthology ID:
2026.findings-acl.657
Volume:
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Month:
July
Year:
2026
Address:
San Diego, California, United States
Editors:
Maria Liakata, Viviane P. Moreira, Jiajun Zhang, David Jurgens
Venue:
Findings
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
13404–13418
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.findings-acl.657/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Yoshinari Fujinuma. 2026. Contrastive Decoding Mitigates Score Range Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026, pages 13404–13418, San Diego, California, United States. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Contrastive Decoding Mitigates Score Range Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge (Fujinuma, Findings 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.findings-acl.657.pdf
Checklist:
 2026.findings-acl.657.checklist.pdf