From Rubrics to Recipe: Principle-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models

Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Ruizi Wang, Dongyeop Kang


Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are often evaluated on benchmarks that rely on surfacelevel instructions, obscuring what defines highquality performance. We argue that tasks can be more precisely characterized through principles: human-readable rules that specify what matters for a good response to the task. Our study proposes a framework to automatically extract and generate task-level principles for data generation and evaluation. Using this approach, we build a benchmark of over 20K principle-aligned instances, enabling controllable data creation and fine-grained, interpretable assessment of LLMs. Experiments show that principles both improve output quality and scale evaluation beyond manual curation, offering a new recipe for principled assessment of LLM capabilities.1
Anthology ID:
2026.evaleval-1.15
Volume:
Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating Evaluations (EvalEval)
Month:
July
Year:
2026
Address:
San Diego, CA
Editors:
Mubashara Akhtar, Jan Batzner, Leshem Choshen, Avijit Ghosh, Usman Gohar, Jennifer Mickel, Ichhya Pant, Zeerak Talat, Michelle Lin
Venues:
EvalEval | WS
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
82–99
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.evaleval-1.15/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Ruizi Wang, and Dongyeop Kang. 2026. From Rubrics to Recipe: Principle-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating Evaluations (EvalEval), pages 82–99, San Diego, CA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
From Rubrics to Recipe: Principle-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models (Hayati et al., EvalEval 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.evaleval-1.15.pdf