@inproceedings{b-etal-2026-shared,
    title = "Shared Task on Prompt Style Recovery for Large Language Models in {T}elugu",
    author = "B, Premjith  and
      G, Jyothish Lal  and
      Chakravarthi, Bharathi Raja  and
      Rajiakodi, Saranya  and
      Durairaj, Thenmozhi  and
      Rajalakshmi, Ratnavel  and
      Ponnusamy, Rahul  and
      Bhuvanesh, Chinthala",
    editor = "Chakravarthi, Bharathi Raja  and
      Priyadharshini, Ruba  and
      Madasamy, Anand Kumar  and
      Thavareesan, Sajeetha  and
      Rajiakodi, Saranya  and
      Navaneethakrishnan, Subalalitha  and
      Chinnappa, Dhivya  and
      Palani, Balasubramanian  and
      Subramanian, Malliga  and
      Shanmugavadivel, Kogilavani  and
      Rajalakshmi, Ratnavel",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Speech, Vision, and Language Technologies for {D}ravidian Languages",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "Underline (Virtual)",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.dravidianlangtech-1.14/",
    pages = "124--133",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-401-9",
    abstract = "This paper presents an overview of the Shared Task on Prompt Recovery for Large Language Models (LLMs) in Telugu, organized as part of DravidianLangTech @ ACL 2026. The task focuses on identifying the underlying communicative style of Telugu text excerpts, framed as a nine-class single-label classification problem covering Formal, Informal, Optimistic, Pessimistic, Humorous, Serious, Inspiring, Authoritative, and Persuasive tones. The dataset was constructed by collecting Telugu YouTube comments and generating style-modified variants using an LLM, resulting in 3,000 training instances, 300 validation samples, and 301 test samples. A total of 52 teams registered for the shared task, with 13 teams submitting valid system predictions. Systems explored diverse approaches, including transformer-based fine-tuning (IndicBERT, MuRIL, XLM-R), ensemble and stacking methods, pairwise modeling strategies, curriculum learning, and few-shot large language model prompting. Evaluation was conducted using Macro F1-score as the primary metric. The top-performing system achieved a Macro F1-score of 0.2987. Overall results indicate that Telugu prompt-style recovery remains a challenging problem, particularly due to stylistic overlap and high lexical similarity across classes."
}