@inproceedings{su-etal-2026-intent,
    title = "Intent-Driven Semantic {ID} Generation for Grounded Conversational News Recommendation",
    author = "Su, Hongyang  and
      Kong, Beibei  and
      Cheng, Lei  and
      Zhuo, Chengxiang  and
      Li, Zang  and
      Yu, Chenyun",
    editor = "Li, Yunyao  and
      Rehm, Georg  and
      Tu, Mei",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2026",
    address = "San Diego, California, USA",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/ingest-acl-workshops/2026.acl-industry.130/",
    pages = "1898--1916",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-394-4",
    abstract = "Conversational news recommendation requires grounding each suggestion in a rapidly evolving article corpus while addressing implicit user intents that lack explicit retrievable keywords. To characterize this scenario, we identify 6 intent types from production dialogues: five are implicit and pose fundamental challenges to standard RAG pipelines, forming a critical retrieve-first bottleneck. To address these issues, we introduce intent-driven Semantic ID (SID) generation under a Generate-then-Match paradigm. With two-stage training that consists of multi-task SID alignment and GPT-4 Chain-of-Thought distillation, an LLM maps diverse intents to hierarchical SID prefixes, which are then fuzzy-matched to the current news pool to guarantee fully grounded recommendations. Profile-Aware Dual-Signal Reasoning (PADR) further enables cold-start users to obtain valid recommendations using only profiles. On a mainstream Chinese news platform, our 7B model achieves 0{\%} hallucination and 12.4{\%} L1 match in the 152K open-generation SID space ($4 \times$ random baseline). It matches GPT-4+Hybrid RAG on L1 while surpassing it on finer-grained metrics (L2 $2 \times$, Category +1.2pp) at $\sim 100 \times$ lower cost. Cold-start users, where existing baselines score 0{\%}, achieve 18.0{\%} L1 ($6 \times$ random), the highest among all user groups."
}