AI-generated text now matches human writing so well that telling them apart is very difficult. Our CIC-NLP team submits results for the DravidianLangTech@NAACL 2025 shared task to reveal AI-generated product reviews in Dravidian languages. We performed a binary classification task with XLM-RoBERTa-Base using the DravidianLangTech@NAACL 2025 datasets offered by the event organizers. Through training the model correctly, our tests could tell between human and AI-generated reviews with scores of 0.96 for Tamil and 0.88 for Malayalam in the evaluation test set. This paper presents detailed information about preprocessing, model architecture, hyperparameter fine-tuning settings, the experimental process, and the results. The source code is available on GitHub1.

Machine-written texts are gradually becoming indistinguishable from human-generated texts, leading to the need to use sophisticated methods to detect them. Team CIC-NLP presents work in the Gen-AI Content Detection Task 1 at COLING 2025 Workshop: the focus of our work is on Subtask B of Task 1, which is the classification of text written by machines and human authors, with particular attention paid to identifying multilingual binary classification problem. Usng mBERT, we addressed the binary classification task using the dataset provided by the GenAI Detection Task team. mBERT acchieved a macro-average F1-score of 0.72 as well as an accuracy score of 0.73.

As machine-generated texts (MGT) become increasingly similar to human writing, these dis- tinctions are harder to identify. In this paper, we as the CIC-NLP team present our submission to the Gen-AI Content Detection Workshop at COLING 2025 for Task 1 Subtask A, which involves distinguishing between text generated by LLMs and text authored by humans, with an emphasis on detecting English-only MGT. We applied the DistilBERT model to this binary classification task using the dataset provided by the organizers. Fine-tuning the model effectively differentiated between the classes, resulting in a micro-average F1-score of 0.70 on the evaluation test set. We provide a detailed explanation of the fine-tuning parameters and steps involved in our analysis.