In recommender systems, users often seek the best products through indirect, vague, or under-specified queries such as “best shoes for trail running.” These queries, referred to as implicit superlative queries, pose a challenge for standard retrieval and ranking systems due to their lack of explicit attribute mentions and the need for identifying and reasoning over complex attributes. We investigate how Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate implicit attributes for ranking and reason over them to improve product recommendations for such queries. As a first step, we propose a novel four-point schema, called SUPERB, for annotating the best product candidates for superlative queries, paired with LLM-based product annotations. We then empirically evaluate several existing retrieval and ranking approaches on our newly created dataset, providing insights and discussing how to integrate these findings into real-world e-commerce production systems.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated excellent capabilities in Question Answering (QA) tasks, yet their ability to identify and address ambiguous questions remains underdeveloped. Ambiguities in user queries often lead to inaccurate or misleading answers, undermining user trust in these systems. Despite prior attempts using prompt-based methods, performance has largely been equivalent to random guessing, leaving a significant gap in effective ambiguity detection. To address this, we propose a novel framework for detecting ambiguous questions within LLM-based QA systems. We first prompt an LLM to generate multiple answers to a question, and then analyze them to infer the ambiguity. We propose to use a lightweight Random Forest model, trained on a bootstrapped and shuffled 6-shot examples dataset. Experimental results on ASQA, PACIFIC, and ABG-COQA datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, with accuracy up to 70.8%. Furthermore, our framework enhances the confidence calibration of LLM outputs, leading to more trustworthy QA systems able to handle complex questions.

End-to-end neural models for conversational AI often assume that a response can be generated by considering only the knowledge acquired by the model during training. Document-oriented conversational models make a similar assumption by conditioning the input on the document and assuming that any other knowledge is captured in the model’s weights. However, a conversation may refer to external knowledge sources. In this work, we present EKo-Doc, an architecture for document-oriented conversations with access to external knowledge: we assume that a conversation is centered around a topic document and that external knowledge is needed to produce responses. EKo-Doc includes a dense passage retriever, a re-ranker, and a response generation model. We train the model end-to-end by using silver labels for the retrieval and re-ranking components that we automatically acquire from the attention signals of the response generation model. We demonstrate with automatic and human evaluations that incorporating external knowledge improves response generation in document-oriented conversations. Our architecture achieves new state-of-the-art results on the Wizard of Wikipedia dataset, outperforming a competitive baseline by 10.3% in Recall@1 and 7.4% in ROUGE-L.

Conversational Task Assistants (CTAs) are conversational agents whose goal is to help humans perform real-world tasks. CTAs can help in exploring available tasks, answering task-specific questions and guiding users through step-by-step instructions. In this work, we present Wizard of Tasks, the first corpus of such conversations in two domains: Cooking and Home Improvement. We crowd-sourced a total of 549 conversations (18,077 utterances) with an asynchronous Wizard-of-Oz setup, relying on recipes from WholeFoods Market for the cooking domain, and WikiHow articles for the home improvement domain. We present a detailed data analysis and show that the collected data can be a valuable and challenging resource for CTAs in two tasks: Intent Classification (IC) and Abstractive Question Answering (AQA). While on IC we acquired a high performing model (>85% F1), on AQA the performance is far from being satisfactory (~27% BertScore-F1), suggesting that more work is needed to solve the task of low-resource AQA.