Adam Sutton


2025

pdf bib
Named Entity Inference Attacks on Clinical LLMs: Exploring Privacy Risks and the Impact of Mitigation Strategies
Adam Sutton | Xi Bai | Kawsar Noor | Thomas Searle | Richard Dobson
Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Privacy in Natural Language Processing

Transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across various domains, including clinical language processing, where they enable state-of-the-art performance in numerous tasks. Like all deep learning models, LLMs are susceptible to inference attacks that exploit sensitive attributes seen during training. AnonCAT, a RoBERTa-based masked language model, has been fine-tuned to de-identify sensitive clinical textual data. The community has a responsibility to explore the privacy risks of these models. This work proposes an attack method to infer sensitive named entities used in the training of AnonCAT models. We perform three experiments; the privacy implications of generating multiple names, the impact of white-box and black-box on attack inference performance, and the privacy-enhancing effects of Differential Privacy (DP) when applied to AnonCAT. By providing real textual predictions and privacy leakage metrics, this research contributes to understanding and mitigating the potential risks associated with exposing LLMs in sensitive domains like healthcare.

2023

pdf bib
You Are What You Read: Inferring Personality From Consumed Textual Content
Adam Sutton | Almog Simchon | Matthew Edwards | Stephan Lewandowsky
Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment, & Social Media Analysis

In this work we use consumed text to infer Big-5 personality inventories using data we have collected from the social media platform Reddit. We test our model on two datasets, sampled from participants who consumed either fiction content (N = 913) or news content (N = 213). We show that state-of-the-art models from a similar task using authored text do not translate well to this task, with average correlations of r=.06 between the model’s predictions and ground-truth personality inventory dimensions. We propose an alternate method of generating average personality labels for each piece of text consumed, under which our model achieves correlations as high as r=.34 when predicting personality from the text being read.