@inproceedings{fan-etal-2025-camieval,
    title = "{CAMIE}val: Enhancing {NLG} Evaluation through Multidimensional Comparative Instruction-Following Analysis",
    author = "Fan, Ziyue  and
      He, Junliang  and
      Xiaoqing, Li  and
      Kuang, Shaohui  and
      Song, Kai  and
      Zhou, Yaqian  and
      Qiu, Xipeng",
    editor = "Chiruzzo, Luis  and
      Ritter, Alan  and
      Wang, Lu",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = apr,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Albuquerque, New Mexico",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2025.naacl-long.438/",
    pages = "8708--8733",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-189-6",
    abstract = "With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs), due to their strong performance across various fields, LLM-based evaluation methods (LLM-as-a-Judge) have become widely used in natural language generation (NLG) evaluation. However, these methods encounter the following challenges: (1) distinguishing instruction-following ability, (2) being applicable across diverse NLG tasks, and (3) identifying low-quality outputs. To address these issues, we propose CAMIEval, a multidimensional comparative evaluation method based on instruction-following. Specifically, we define three fundamental dimensions of instruction-following: relevance, factuality, and adherence. Subsequently, we introduce a concrete Chain-of-Thoughts (ConcreteCoT) process to enhance the accuracy of evaluations. In addition, we trained a ``regrettable model'' RegretLM to generate low-quality outputs, which helps the evaluator better identify the potential shortcomings of the candidate output by comparing low-quality outputs with reference outputs. Through this comparison, the evaluator can generate instruction-specific dimensions that complement the fundamental dimensions, forming a more comprehensive evaluation metric system. Experiments on two NLG evaluation benchmarks demonstrate that CAMIEval consistently outperforms existing methods in terms of correlation with human evaluations, providing a general and accurate framework for evaluating the outputs of LLMs."
}