@inproceedings{beno-2025-electra,
    title = "{ELECTRA} and {GPT}-4o: Cost-Effective Partners for Sentiment Analysis",
    author = "Beno, James P.",
    editor = "Shi, Weijia  and
      Yu, Wenhao  and
      Asai, Akari  and
      Jiang, Meng  and
      Durrett, Greg  and
      Hajishirzi, Hannaneh  and
      Zettlemoyer, Luke",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Knowledge-Augmented Methods for Natural Language Processing",
    month = may,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2025.knowledgenlp-1.2/",
    pages = "18--36",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-229-9",
    abstract = "Bidirectional transformers excel at sentiment analysis, and Large Language Models (LLM) are effective zero-shot learners. Might they perform better as a team? This paper explores collaborative approaches between ELECTRA and GPT-4o for three-way sentiment classification. We fine-tuned (FT) four models (ELECTRA Base/Large, GPT-4o/4o-mini) using a mix of reviews from Stanford Sentiment Treebank (SST) and DynaSent. We provided input from ELECTRA to GPT as: predicted label, probabilities, and retrieved examples. Sharing ELECTRA Base FT predictions with GPT-4o-mini significantly improved performance over either model alone (82.50 macro F1 vs. 79.14 ELECTRA Base FT, 79.41 GPT-4o-mini) and yielded the lowest cost/performance ratio ({\$}0.12/F1 point). However, when GPT models were fine-tuned, including predictions decreased performance. GPT-4o FT-M was the top performer (86.99), with GPT-4o-mini FT close behind (86.70) at much less cost ({\$}0.38 vs. {\$}1.59/F1 point). Our results show that augmenting prompts with predictions from fine-tuned encoders is an efficient way to boost performance, and a fine-tuned GPT-4o-mini is nearly as good as GPT-4o FT at 76{\%} less cost. Both are affordable options for projects with limited resources."
}