@inproceedings{barua-etal-2025-cuet,
    title = "{CUET}{\_}{A}bsolute{\_}{Z}ero@{D}ravidian{L}ang{T}ech 2025: Detecting {AI}-Generated Product Reviews in {M}alayalam and {T}amil Language Using Transformer Models",
    author = "Barua, Anindo  and
      Muntaha, Sidratul  and
      Labib, Momtazul Arefin  and
      Rahman, Samia  and
      Das, Udoy  and
      Murad, Hasan",
    editor = "Chakravarthi, Bharathi Raja  and
      Priyadharshini, Ruba  and
      Madasamy, Anand Kumar  and
      Thavareesan, Sajeetha  and
      Sherly, Elizabeth  and
      Rajiakodi, Saranya  and
      Palani, Balasubramanian  and
      Subramanian, Malliga  and
      Cn, Subalalitha  and
      Chinnappa, Dhivya",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Speech, Vision, and Language Technologies for Dravidian Languages",
    month = may,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Acoma, The Albuquerque Convention Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2025.dravidianlangtech-1.71/",
    pages = "398--403",
    ISBN = "979-8-89176-228-2",
    abstract = "Artificial Intelligence (AI) is opening new doors of learning and interaction. However, it has its share of problems. One major issue is the ability of AI to generate text that resembles human-written text. So, how can we tell apart human-written text from AI-generated text?With this in mind, we have worked on detecting AI-generated product reviews in Dravidian languages, mainly in Malayalam and Tamil. The ``Shared Task on Detecting AI-Generated Product Reviews in Dravidian Languages,'' held as part of the DravidianLangTech Workshop at NAACL 2025 has provided a dataset categorized into two categories, human-written review and AI-generated review. We have implemented four machine learning models (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and XGBoost), four deep learning models (Long Short-Term Memory, Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory, Gated Recurrent Unit, and Recurrent Neural Network), and three transformer-based models (AI-Human-Detector, Detect-AI-Text, and E5-Small-Lora-AI-Generated-Detector). We have conducted a comparative study among all the models by training and evaluating each model on the dataset. We have discovered that the transformer, E5-Small-Lora-AI-Generated-Detector, has provided the best result with an F1 score of 0.8994 on the test set ranking 7th position in the Malayalam language. Tamil has a higher token overlap and richer morphology than Malayalam. Thus, we obtained a worse F1 score of 0.5877 ranking 28th position in the Tamil language among all participants in the shared task."
}