@inproceedings{held-habernal-2024-semeval,
    title = "{S}em{E}val-2024 Task 5: Argument Reasoning in Civil Procedure",
    author = "Held, Lena  and
      Habernal, Ivan",
    editor = {Ojha, Atul Kr.  and
      Do{\u{g}}ru{\"o}z, A. Seza  and
      Tayyar Madabushi, Harish  and
      Da San Martino, Giovanni  and
      Rosenthal, Sara  and
      Ros{\'a}, Aiala},
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2024)",
    month = jun,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Mexico City, Mexico",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2024.semeval-1.276/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.semeval-1.276",
    pages = "2027--2038",
    abstract = "This paper describes the results of SemEval-2024 Task 5: Argument Reasoning in Civil Procedure, consisting of a single task on judging and reasoning about the answers to questions in U.S. civil procedure. The dataset for this task contains question, answer and explanation pairs taken from The Glannon Guide To Civil Procedure (Glannon, 2018). The task was to classify in a binary manner if the answer is a correct choice for the question or not. Twenty participants submitted their solutions, with the best results achieving a remarkable 82.31{\%} F1-score. We summarize and analyze the results from all participating systems and provide an overview over the systems of 14 participants."
}