@inproceedings{siino-2024-mistral,
    title = "Mistral at {S}em{E}val-2024 Task 5: Mistral 7{B} for argument reasoning in Civil Procedure",
    author = "Siino, Marco",
    editor = {Ojha, Atul Kr.  and
      Do{\u{g}}ru{\"o}z, A. Seza  and
      Tayyar Madabushi, Harish  and
      Da San Martino, Giovanni  and
      Rosenthal, Sara  and
      Ros{\'a}, Aiala},
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2024)",
    month = jun,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Mexico City, Mexico",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2024.semeval-1.24/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.semeval-1.24",
    pages = "155--162",
    abstract = "At the SemEval-2024 Task 5, the organizers introduce a novel natural language processing (NLP) challenge and dataset within the realm of the United States civil procedure. Each datum within the dataset comprises a comprehensive overview of a legal case, a specific inquiry associated with it, and a potential argument in support of a solution, supplemented with an in-depth rationale elucidating the applicability of the argument within the given context. Derived from a text designed for legal education purposes, this dataset presents a multifaceted benchmarking task for contemporary legal language models. Our manuscript delineates the approach we adopted for participation in this competition. Specifically, we detail the use of a Mistral 7B model to answer the question provided. Our only and best submission reach an F1-score equal to 0.5597 and an Accuracy of 0.5714, outperforming the baseline provided for the task."
}