@inproceedings{calzada-perez-2024-russia,
    title = "{R}ussia and {U}kraine through the Eyes of {P}arla{M}int 4.0: A Collocational {CADS} Profile of {S}panish and {B}ritish Parliamentary Discourses",
    author = "Calzada Perez, Maria",
    editor = "Fiser, Darja  and
      Eskevich, Maria  and
      Bordon, David",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the IV Workshop on Creating, Analysing, and Increasing Accessibility of Parliamentary Corpora (ParlaCLARIN) @ LREC-COLING 2024",
    month = may,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Torino, Italia",
    publisher = "ELRA and ICCL",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2024.parlaclarin-1.13/",
    pages = "84--93",
    abstract = "This article resorts to mixed methods to examine British and Spanish parliamentary discourse. The quantitative corpus-assisted (lexical priming) theory and data are complemented by the qualitative discourse historical approach. Two CLARIN ParlaMint corpora {--} ParlamMint-GB and ParlaMint-ES {--} are queried in the analysis, which focuses on English ({``}Rusia'' and ``Ukraine'') and Spanish ({``}Rusia'' and ``Ucrania'') nodes and collocations. In sum, the analysis sketches a brief profile of each corpus. The British House of Commons is more homogenous, strongly associating ``Russia'' and ``Ukraine'' with their participation in the war. Furthermore, this chamber shows a greater interest in ``Russia. The Spanish Congreso de los Diputados indicates greater quantitative differences (heterogeneity). Here, ``Russia'' clearly transcends its role as a military contender and is also portrayed as an economic competitor for the West. Unlike in Britain, the Spanish lower house shows more mentions of ``Ucrania'', which is assigned just one role {--} as an invasion victim. In conclusion, the productivity of corpus-assisted mixed methods is confirmed along with the precious value of the ParlaMint constellation."
}