@inproceedings{rothermel-etal-2024-infact,
    title = "{I}n{F}act: A Strong Baseline for Automated Fact-Checking",
    author = "Rothermel, Mark  and
      Braun, Tobias  and
      Rohrbach, Marcus  and
      Rohrbach, Anna",
    editor = "Schlichtkrull, Michael  and
      Chen, Yulong  and
      Whitehouse, Chenxi  and
      Deng, Zhenyun  and
      Akhtar, Mubashara  and
      Aly, Rami  and
      Guo, Zhijiang  and
      Christodoulopoulos, Christos  and
      Cocarascu, Oana  and
      Mittal, Arpit  and
      Thorne, James  and
      Vlachos, Andreas",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Seventh Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER)",
    month = nov,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Miami, Florida, USA",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2024.fever-1.12/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.fever-1.12",
    pages = "108--112",
    abstract = "The spread of disinformation poses a global threat to democratic societies, necessitating robust and scalable Automated Fact-Checking (AFC) systems. The AVeriTeC Shared Task Challenge 2024 offers a realistic benchmark for text-based fact-checking methods. This paper presents Information-Retrieving Fact-Checker (InFact), an LLM-based approach that breaks down the task of claim verification into a 6-stage process, including evidence retrieval. When using GPT-4o as the backbone, InFact achieves an AVeriTeC score of 63{\%} on the test set, outperforming all other 20 teams competing in the challenge, and establishing a new strong baseline for future text-only AFC systems. Qualitative analysis of mislabeled instances reveals that InFact often yields a more accurate conclusion than AVeriTeC{'}s human-annotated ground truth."
}