@inproceedings{rippeth-post-2022-additive,
title = "Additive Interventions Yield Robust Multi-Domain Machine Translation Models",
author = "Rippeth, Elijah and
Post, Matt",
editor = {Koehn, Philipp and
Barrault, Lo{\"i}c and
Bojar, Ond{\v{r}}ej and
Bougares, Fethi and
Chatterjee, Rajen and
Costa-juss{\`a}, Marta R. and
Federmann, Christian and
Fishel, Mark and
Fraser, Alexander and
Freitag, Markus and
Graham, Yvette and
Grundkiewicz, Roman and
Guzman, Paco and
Haddow, Barry and
Huck, Matthias and
Jimeno Yepes, Antonio and
Kocmi, Tom and
Martins, Andr{\'e} and
Morishita, Makoto and
Monz, Christof and
Nagata, Masaaki and
Nakazawa, Toshiaki and
Negri, Matteo and
N{\'e}v{\'e}ol, Aur{\'e}lie and
Neves, Mariana and
Popel, Martin and
Turchi, Marco and
Zampieri, Marcos},
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Machine Translation (WMT)",
month = dec,
year = "2022",
address = "Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (Hybrid)",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2022.wmt-1.14/",
pages = "220--232",
abstract = "Additive interventions are a recently-proposed mechanism for controlling target-side attributes in neural machine translation by modulating the encoder{'}s representation of a source sequence as opposed to manipulating the raw source sequence as seen in most previous tag-based approaches. In this work we examine the role of additive interventions in a large-scale multi-domain machine translation setting and compare its performance in various inference scenarios. We find that while the performance difference is small between intervention-based systems and tag-based systems when the domain label matches the test domain, intervention-based systems are robust to label error, making them an attractive choice under label uncertainty. Further, we find that the superiority of single-domain fine-tuning comes under question when training data is scaled, contradicting previous findings."
}