@inproceedings{maupome-meurs-2020-language,
    title = "Language Modeling with a General Second-Order {RNN}",
    author = "Maupom{\'e}, Diego  and
      Meurs, Marie-Jean",
    editor = "Calzolari, Nicoletta  and
      B{\'e}chet, Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric  and
      Blache, Philippe  and
      Choukri, Khalid  and
      Cieri, Christopher  and
      Declerck, Thierry  and
      Goggi, Sara  and
      Isahara, Hitoshi  and
      Maegaard, Bente  and
      Mariani, Joseph  and
      Mazo, H{\'e}l{\`e}ne  and
      Moreno, Asuncion  and
      Odijk, Jan  and
      Piperidis, Stelios",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
    month = may,
    year = "2020",
    address = "Marseille, France",
    publisher = "European Language Resources Association",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2020.lrec-1.584/",
    pages = "4749--4753",
    language = "eng",
    ISBN = "979-10-95546-34-4",
    abstract = "Different Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) architectures update their state in different manners as the input sequence is processed. RNNs including a multiplicative interaction between their current state and the current input, second-order ones, show promising performance in language modeling. In this paper, we introduce a second-order RNNs that generalizes existing ones. Evaluating on the Penn Treebank dataset, we analyze how its different components affect its performance in character-lever recurrent language modeling. We perform our experiments controlling the parameter counts of models. We find that removing the first-order terms does not hinder performance. We perform further experiments comparing the effects of the relative size of the state space and the multiplicative interaction space on performance. Our expectation was that a larger states would benefit language models built on longer documents, and larger multiplicative interaction states would benefit ones built on larger input spaces. However, our results suggest that this is not the case and the optimal relative size is the same for both document tokenizations used."
}