@inproceedings{song-liu-2020-yong,
title = "用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题{---}{---}以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照(Quantitive Stylistics Based Research on the Controversy of the Author of ``{T}ales of the {M}arshes'': Comparing with ``{P}ingyaozhuan'' of {L}uo {G}uanzhong)",
author = "Song, Li and
Liu, Ying",
editor = "Sun, Maosong and
Li, Sujian and
Zhang, Yue and
Liu, Yang",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 19th Chinese National Conference on Computational Linguistics",
month = oct,
year = "2020",
address = "Haikou, China",
publisher = "Chinese Information Processing Society of China",
url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2020.ccl-1.5/",
pages = "43--53",
language = "zho",
abstract = "《水浒传》是独著还是合著,施耐庵和罗贯中是何关系一直存在争议。本文将其作者争议粗略归纳为施耐庵作、罗贯中作、施作罗续、罗作他续、施作罗改五种情况,以罗贯中的《平妖传》为参照,用假设检验、文本聚类、文本分类、波动风格计量等方法,结合对文本内容的分析,考察《水浒传》的写作风格,试图为其作者身份认定提供参考。结果显示,只有罗作他续的可能性大,即前70回为罗贯中所作,后由他人续写,其他四种情况可能性都较小。"
}
Markdown (Informal)
[用计量风格学方法考察《水浒传》的作者争议问题——以罗贯中《平妖传》为参照(Quantitive Stylistics Based Research on the Controversy of the Author of “Tales of the Marshes”: Comparing with “Pingyaozhuan” of Luo Guanzhong)](https://preview.aclanthology.org/fix-sig-urls/2020.ccl-1.5/) (Song & Liu, CCL 2020)
ACL