@inproceedings{k-h-de-nardi-2026-rethinking,
    title = "Rethinking Polarity Detection: When {BPE} Fails Across Scripts",
    author = "K H, Manodyna  and
      De Nardi, Luc",
    editor = "El-Haj, Mo  and
      Rayson, Paul  and
      Jarrar, Mustafa  and
      Ezeani, Ignatius  and
      Ezzini, Saad  and
      Ahmadi, Sina  and
      Haddad, Amal Haddad  and
      Amol, Cynthia  and
      Abdelali, Ahmad  and
      Abudalfa, Shadi",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on {NLP} for Languages Using {A}rabic Script",
    month = mar,
    year = "2026",
    address = "Rabat, Morocco",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/eacl-dois/2026.abjadnlp-1.2/",
    doi = "10.18653/v1/2026.abjadnlp-1.2",
    pages = "6--14",
    abstract = "Multilingual evaluation often relies on language coverage or translated benchmarks, implicitly assuming that subword tokenization behaves comparably across scripts. In mixed-script settings, this assumption breaks down. We examine this effect using polarity detection as a case study, comparing Orthographic Syllable Pair Encoding (OSPE) and Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) under identical architectures, data, and training conditions on SemEval Task 9, which spans Devanagari, Perso-Arabic, and Latin scripts. OSPE is applied to Hindi, Nepali, Urdu, and Arabic, while BPE is retained for English. We find that BPE systematically underestimates performance in abugida and abjad scripts, producing fragmented representations, unstable optimization, and drops of up to 27 macro-F1 points for Nepali, while English remains largely unaffected. Script-aware segmentation preserves orthographic structure, stabilizes training, and improves cross-language comparability without additional data or model scaling, highlighting tokenization as a latent but consequential evaluation decision in multilingual benchmarks. While the analysis spans multiple scripts, we place particular emphasis on Arabic and Perso-Arabic languages, where frequency-driven tokenization most severely disrupts orthographic and morphological structure."
}