Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a widely used and vital assessment format for evaluating large language models (LLMs). This study reveals that LLMs are susceptible to “cognitive load” caused by distractor options in MCQs, leading to excessive attention to distractors and consequent vacillation between correct and incorrect options. To mitigate this cognitive burden, we introduce a novel reasoning prompt strategy, called EoT, which effectively reduces cognitive load by steering the model’s attention away from erroneous options. This enables the model to focus more effectively on reasonable answers. Additionally, by documenting the elimination process, EoT enhances the transparency and interpretability of the model’s reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that EoT, as a plug-and-play approach, significantly reduces cognitive load and improves performance, showcasing its potential to enhance both the accuracy and interpretability of LLMs.

Current literature demonstrates that Large Language Models (LLMs) are great few-shot learners, and prompting significantly increases their performance on a range of downstream tasks in a few-shot learning setting. An attempt to automate human-led prompting followed, with some progress achieved. In particular, subsequent work demonstrates that automation can outperform fine-tuning in certain K-shot learning scenarios. In this paper, we revisit techniques for automated prompting on six different downstream tasks and a larger range of K-shot learning settings. We find that automated prompting does not consistently outperform simple manual prompting. Our work suggests that, in addition to fine-tuning, manual prompting should be used as a baseline in this line of research.