Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in coding tasks like code generation and debugging. However, code from real-world users is often poorly styled, containing various types of noise, such as structural inconsistencies, stylistic deviations and flawed test cases. To investigate this, we first simulate poorly styled code using eight types of code perturbations, and then demonstrate that the debugging performance of existing LLM-based methods significantly declines on such inputs. Furthermore, to address this, we propose a novel debugging method called Code-SPA, which aligns noisy code with the well-structured style familiar to LLMs, mitigating the impact of stylistic inconsistencies. Specifically, Code-SPA extracts the model’s preferred coding style from a reference snippet, then adjusts the input code by Concrete Syntax Tree (CST)-based transformations and LLM-assisted refinements before debugging. By aligning the code style preference, Code-SPA enhances the debugging performance of both code-specific and general-purpose LLMs on both poorly and well-styled code across the HumanEval, MBPP and EvalPlus datasets.

Query expansion (QE) is a critical component in the open-domain question answering (OpenQA) pipeline, enhancing the retrieval performance by broadening the scope of queries with additional relevant texts. However, existing methods like GAR and EAR rely heavily on supervised training and often struggle to maintain effectiveness across domains and datasets. Meanwhile, although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated QE capability for information retrieval (IR) tasks, their application in OpenQA is hindered by the inadequate analysis of query’s informational needs and the lack of quality control for generated QEs, failing to meet the unique requirements of OpenQA. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel LLM-based QE approach named AGR for the OpenQA task, leveraging a three-step prompting strategy. AGR begins with an analysis of the query, followed by the generation of answer-oriented expansions, and culminates with a refinement process for better query formulation. Extensive experiments on four OpenQA datasets reveal that AGR not only rivals in-domain supervised methods in retrieval accuracy, but also outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in out-domain zero-shot scenarios. Moreover, it exhibits enhanced performance in end-to-end QA evaluations, underscoring the superiority of AGR for OpenQA.