Operational safety in high-stakes domains such as industrial process control, autonomous, and safety-critical systems demand reliable hazard identification. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating safety analysis tasks, single-turn, monolithic inference is brittle: it lacks the self-correction, deliberation, and contextual refinement that safety engineers apply iteratively. In this paper, we introduce HAZDIAL, a framework that investigates whether structured agentic dialogue (multi-agent, multi-turn interactions) improves the quality of NLP-based hazard identification over single-pass baselines. We systematically compare two dialogue modalities: adversarial debate and constructive discussion, and propose an genetic algorithm-based agentic interaction optimization. We evaluate all configurations against a curated golden dataset using standard classification metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1) and a novel dialogue metrics. This work advances the intersection of dialogue systems, multi-agent reasoning, and AI safety, providing empirical evidence for dialogue-driven hazard analysis.

Operational safety in mission-critical environments requires AI systems that are accurate, interpretable, and resistant to hallucination. We present an agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework, REFSafe, for grounded hazard analysis and automated safety report generation. The system integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with structured operational data, historical incident repositories, policy documents, and external authoritative sources. Through iterative agentic reasoning, the framework retrieves, verifies, and synthesizes evidence prior to generation, enforcing citation-backed outputs with explicit source attribution (documents, links, and prior events) to ensure traceability and trust.To mitigate hallucinations and unsupported claims, all risk assessments and forecasts are constrained to retrieved evidence, with confidence signals derived from retrieval relevance and source consistency. A transparent pipeline enables subject matter experts (SMEs) to validate predictions, and provide structured feedback, forming a continuous performance calibration loop. Preliminary deployment demonstrates improved reliability in hazard detection and safety/vulnerability report generation. This work advances trustworthy, evidence-grounded AI for predictive safety intelligence in mission-critical operations.

To evaluate the scientific influence of observational facilities, astronomers examine the body of publications that have utilized data from those facilities. This depends on curated bibliographies that annotate and connect data products to the corresponding literature, enabling bibliometric analyses to quantify data impact. Compiling such bibliographies is a demanding process that requires expert curators to scan the literature for relevant names, acronyms, and identifiers, and then to determine whether and how specific observations contributed to each publication. These bibliographies have value beyond impact assessment: for research scientists, explicit links between data and literature form an essential pathway for discovering and accessing data. Accordingly, by building on the work of librarians and archivists, telescope bibliographies can be repurposed to directly support scientific inquiry. In this context, we present the Telescope Reference and Astronomy Categorization Shared task (TRACS) and its accompanying dataset, which comprises more than 89,000 publicly available English-language texts drawn from space telescope bibliographies. These texts are labeled according to a new, compact taxonomy developed in consultation with experienced bibliographers.