The multimodal ambiguity of text-embedded images (memes), particularly those pertaining to marginalized communities, presents a significant challenge for natural language and vision processing. The subtle interaction between text, image, and cultural context makes it challenging to develop robust moderation tools. This paper tackles this challenge across four key tasks: (A) Hate Speech Detection, (B) Hate Target Classification, (C) Topical Stance Classification, and (D) Intended Humor Detection. We demonstrate that the nuances of these tasks demand a departure from a ‘onesize-fits-all’ approach. Our central contribution is a task-specific methodology, where we align model architecture with the specific challenges of each task, all built upon a common CLIP-ViT backbone. Our results illustrate the strong performance of this task-specific approach, with multiple architectures excelling at each task. For Hate Speech Detection (Task A), the Co-Attention Ensemble model achieved a top F1-score of 0.7929; for Hate Target Classification (Task B), our Hierarchical CrossAttention Transformer achieved an F1-score of 0.5777; and for Stance (Task C) and Humor Detection (Task D), our Two-Stage Multiplicative Fusion Framework yielded leading F1-scores of 0.6070 and 0.7529, respectively. Beyond raw results, we also provide detailed error analyses, including confusion matrices, to reveal weaknesses driven by multimodal ambiguity and class imbalance. Ultimately, this work provides a blueprint for the community, establishing that optimal performance in multimodal analysis is achieved not by a single superior model, but through the customized design of specialized solutions, supported by empirical validation of key methodological choices.

This paper describes our submissions to the TSAR 2025 Shared Task on Readability-Controlled Text Simplification. We present a comparative study of three architectures a rule-based baseline, a heuristic-driven expert system, and a zero-shot generative T5 pipeline with a semantic guardrail. Our analysis shows a trade-off between the controllability of rule-based systems and the fluency of generative models. In this zero-shot setting, simpler, confined systems achieved superior meaning preservation scores compared to the more powerful but less predictable generative model. We present a diagnostic failure analysis on system outputs, illustrating how different architectures result in distinct error patterns such as under-simplification, information loss via heuristics, and semantic drift.

This paper presents rankedCOMET, a lightweight per-language-pair calibration applied to the publicly available Unbabel/wmt22-comet-da model that yields a competitive Quality Estimation (QE) system for the WMT 2025 shared task. This approach transforms raw model outputs into per-language average ranks and min–max normalizes those ranks to [0,1], maintaining intra-language ordering while generating consistent numeric ranges across language pairs. Applied to 742,740 test segments and submitted to Codabench, this unsupervised post-processing enhanced the aggregated Pearson correlation on the preliminary snapshot and led to a 5th-place finish. We provide detailed pseudocode, ablations (including a negative ensemble attempt), and a reproducible analysis pipeline providing Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall correlations with bootstrap confidence intervals.