Our team, Narrative Miners, participated in SemEval-2025 Task 10 to tackle the challenge of detecting manipulative narratives in online news, focusing on the Ukraine-Russia war and climate change. We worked on three key subtasks: classifying entity roles, categorizing narratives and subnarratives, and generating concise narrative explanations. Using transformer-based models like BART, BERT, GPT-2, and Flan-T5, we implemented a structured pipeline and applied data augmentation to enhance performance. BART-CNN proved to be our best-performing model, significantly improving classification accuracy and explanation generation. Despite challenges like dataset limitations and class imbalance, our approach demonstrated the effectiveness of hierarchical classification and multilingual analysis in combating online disinformation. We made use of different data augmentation techniques to cover the class imbalances present in the dataset. We had different evaluation metrics set for each subtask, specifically focusing on the need of that particular outcome. With this paper, we hope to play our part in mitigating the impact of harmful disinformation.

SemEval Task 6: Promise Eval, was designed to evaluate a company’s adherence to its ESG commitments. Using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Deep Learning techniques, the task involves analyzing ESG reports to identify, classify, and verify corporate promises. The verification process follows a structured pipeline with four subtasks: Promise Classification, Evidence Verification, Evidence Classification, and Timeline Verification. These subtasks ensure that identified promises are well-defined, supported by credible evidence, and time-bound.For model implementation, BERT was initially used for most of the classification tasks but was later replaced with DeBERTa, which improved performance due to its superior contextual understanding. To enhance model generalization, contrastive learning was applied alongside standard classification loss, helping the model differentiate between positive and negative examples. Oversampling techniques were used to address class imbalance issues, particularly for the Misleading evidence category. For timeline verification, BART was chosen initially but then shifted to DeBERTa again, as it better captures sequential dependencies in text.The dataset consists of ESG reports containing labeled promise statements, evidence snippets, and timeline information. The data was preprocessed by tokenizing text, handling imbalanced classes through oversampling, and incorporating domain-specific embeddings to improve understanding.By implementing these techniques, the research aims to provide a transparent and accountable framework for assessing corporate promises, ensuring that companies are held accountable for their ESG commitments.