Human processing of idioms heavily depends on interpreting the surrounding context in which they appear. While large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance on idiomaticity detection benchmarks, this success may be driven by reasoning shortcuts present in existing datasets. To address this, we introduce a novel, controlled contrastive dataset (DICE) specifically designed to assess whether LLMs can effectively leverage context to disambiguate idiomatic meanings. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of collocational frequency and sentence probability—proxies for human processing known to affect idiom resolution—on model performance. Our results show that LLMs frequently fail to resolve idiomaticity when it depends on contextual understanding, performing better on sentences deemed more likely by the model. Additionally, idiom frequency influences performance but does not guarantee accurate interpretation. Our findings emphasize the limitations of current models in grasping contextual meaning and highlight the need for more context-sensitive evaluation.

Idiomatic expressions present a unique challenge in NLP, as their meanings are often notdirectly inferable from their constituent words. Despite recent advancements in Large LanguageModels (LLMs), idiomaticity remains a significant obstacle to robust semantic representation.We present datasets and tasks for SemEval-2025 Task 1: AdMiRe (Advancing Multimodal Idiomaticity Representation), which challenges the community to assess and improve models’ ability to interpret idiomatic expressions in multimodal contexts and in multiple languages. Participants competed in two subtasks: ranking images based on their alignment with idiomatic or literal meanings, and predicting the next image in a sequence. The most effective methods achieved human-level performance by leveraging pretrained LLMs and vision-language models in mixture-of-experts settings, with multiple queries used to smooth over the weaknesses in these models’ representations of idiomaticity.

Despite the recent ubiquity of large language models and their high zero-shot prompted performance across a wide range of tasks, it is still not known how well they perform on tasks which require processing of potentially idiomatic language. In particular, how well do such models perform in comparison to encoder-only models fine-tuned specifically for idiomaticity tasks? In this work, we attempt to answer this question by looking at the performance of a range of LLMs (both local and software-as-a-service models) on three idiomaticity datasets: SemEval 2022 Task 2a, FLUTE, and MAGPIE. Overall, we find that whilst these models do give competitive performance, they do not match the results of fine-tuned task-specific models, even at the largest scales (e.g. for GPT-4). Nevertheless, we do see consistent performance improvements across model scale. Additionally, we investigate prompting approaches to improve performance, and discuss the practicalities of using LLMs for these tasks.

This paper presents our findings for SemEval2024 Task 4. We submit only to subtask 1, applying the text-to-text framework using a FLAN-T5 model with a combination of parameter efficient fine-tuning methods - low-rankadaptation and prompt tuning. Overall, we find that the system performs well in English, but performance is limited in Bulgarian, North Macedonian and Arabic. Our analysis raises interesting questions about the effects of labelorder and label names when applying the text-to-text framework.