The performance of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) depends on the availability of transcribed speech datasets—often scarce ornon-existent for many of the worlds languages. This study investigates alternative strategies to bridge the data gap using zero-shot cross-lingual transfer, leveraging transliteration as a method to utilize data from other languages. We experiment with transliteration from various source languages and demonstrate ASR performance in a low-resourced language, Amharic. We find that source data that align with the character distribution of the test data achieves the best performance, regardless of language family. We also experiment with fine-tuning with minimal transcribed data in the target language. Our findings demonstrate that transliteration, particularly when combined with a strategic choice of source languages, is a viable approach for improving ASR in zero-shot and low-resourced settings.

As languages evolve, we risk losing ancestral languages. In this paper, we explore Historical Language Reconstruction (HLR) for Proto-Sabean languages, starting with the identification of cognates–sets of words in different related languages that are derived from the same ancestral language. We (1) collect semantically related words in three Afro-Semitic languages from a three-way dictionary (2) work with linguists to identify cognates and reconstruct the proto-form of the cognates, (3) experiment with three automatic cognate detection methods and extract cognates from the semantically related words. We then experiment with in-context learning with GPT-4o to generate the proto-language from the cognates and use Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) models for HLR.

Knowledge Graphs represent real-world entities and the relationships between them. Multilingual Knowledge Graph Construction (mKGC) refers to the task of automatically constructing or predicting missing entities and links for knowledge graphs in a multilingual setting. In this work, we reformulate the mKGC task as a Question Answering (QA) task and introduce mRAKL: a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) based system to perform mKGC. We achieve this by using the head entity and linking relation in a question, and having our model predict the tail entity as an answer. Our experiments focus primarily on two low-resourced languages: Tigrinya and Amharic. We experiment with using higher-resourced languages, Arabic and English, to utilize cross-lingual transfer for mKGC. With a BM25 retriever, we find that the RAG-based approach improves performance over a no-context setting. Further, our ablation studies show that with an idealized retrieval system, mRAKL improves accuracy by up to 4.92 and 8.79 percentage points for Tigrinya and Amharic, respectively.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are deployed in several aspects of everyday life. While the technology could have several benefits, like many socio-technical systems, it also encodes several biases. Trained on large, crawled datasets from the web, these models perpetuate stereotypes and regurgitate representational bias that is rampant in their training data. Languages encode gender in varying ways; some languages are grammatically gendered, while others do not. Bias in the languages themselves may also vary based on cultural, social, and religious contexts. In this paper, we investigate gender bias in LLMs by selecting two languages, Twi and Amharic. Twi is a non-gendered African language spoken in Ghana, while Amharic is a gendered language spoken in Ethiopia. Using these two languages on the two ends of the continent and their opposing grammatical gender system, we evaluate LLMs in three tasks: Machine Translation, Image Generation, and Sentence Completion. Our results give insights into the gender bias encoded in LLMs using two low-resourced languages and broaden the conversation on how culture and social structures play a role in disparate system performances.

The disparity in the languages commonly studied in Natural Language Processing (NLP) is typically reflected by referring to languages as low vs high-resourced. However, there is limited consensus on what exactly qualifies as a ‘low-resource language.’ To understand how NLP papers define and study ‘low resource’ languages, we qualitatively analyzed 150 papers from the ACL Anthology and popular speech-processing conferences that mention the keyword ‘low-resource.’ Based on our analysis, we show how several interacting axes contribute to ‘low-resourcedness’ of a language and why that makes it difficult to track progress for each individual language. We hope our work (1) elicits explicit definitions of the terminology when it is used in papers and (2) provides grounding for the different axes to consider when connoting a language as low-resource.

While Machine Translation (MT) research has progressed over the years, translation systems still suffer from biases, including gender bias. While an active line of research studies the existence and mitigation strategies of gender bias in machine translation systems, there is limited research exploring this phenomenon for low-resource languages. The limited availability of linguistic and computational resources confounded with the lack of benchmark datasets makes studying bias for low-resourced languages that much more difficult. In this paper, we construct benchmark datasets to evaluate gender bias in machine translation for three low-resource languages: Afaan Oromoo (Orm), Amharic (Amh), and Tigrinya (Tir). Building on prior work, we collected 2400 gender-balanced sentences parallelly translated into the three languages. From human evaluations of the dataset we collected, we found that about 93% of Afaan Oromoo, 80% of Tigrinya, and 72% of Amharic sentences exhibited gender bias. In addition to providing benchmarks for improving gender bias mitigation research in the three languages, we hope the careful documentation of our work will help other low-resourced language researchers extend our approach to their languages.

This paper describes CIC NLP’s submission to the AmericasNLP 2023 Shared Task on machine translation systems for indigenous languages of the Americas. We present the system descriptions for three methods. We used two multilingual models, namely M2M-100 and mBART50, and one bilingual (one-to-one) — Helsinki NLP Spanish-English translation model, and experimented with different transfer learning setups. We experimented with 11 languages from America and report the setups we used as well as the results we achieved. Overall, the mBART setup was able to improve upon the baseline for three out of the eleven languages.