@article{gao-etal-2025-llm,
    title = "{LLM}-based {NLG} Evaluation: Current Status and Challenges",
    author = "Gao, Mingqi  and
      Hu, Xinyu  and
      Yin, Xunjian  and
      Ruan, Jie  and
      Pu, Xiao  and
      Wan, Xiaojun",
    journal = "Computational Linguistics",
    volume = "51",
    month = jun,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Cambridge, MA",
    publisher = "MIT Press",
    url = "https://preview.aclanthology.org/corrections-2025-07/2025.cl-2.9/",
    doi = "10.1162/coli_a_00561",
    pages = "661--687",
    abstract = "Evaluating natural language generation (NLG) is a vital but challenging problem in natural language processing. Traditional evaluation metrics mainly capturing content (e.g., n-gram) overlap between system outputs and references are far from satisfactory, and large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have demonstrated great potential in NLG evaluation in recent years. Various automatic evaluation methods based on LLMs have been proposed, including metrics derived from LLMs, prompting LLMs, fine-tuning LLMs, and human{--}LLM collaborative evaluation. In this survey, we first give a taxonomy of LLM-based NLG evaluation methods, and discuss their pros and cons, respectively. Lastly, we discuss several open problems in this area and point out future research directions."
}