Language Models and Externalism: A Reply to Mandelkern and Linzen

Gary Ostertag


Abstract
Do texts generated by language models (LMs) refer? Mandelkern and Linzen (2024) argue that externalist principles point to an affirmative conclusion. What grounds reference, according to their externalism, is a term’s “natural history”. For example, ‘water’ refers to H2O among English speakers, and not to the phenomenally indistinguishable chemical XYZ, because H2O, and not XYZ, is implicated in the natural history of ‘water’. Appealing to the literature on contrastive explanation, I show that a term’s natural history does not generally ground its referential properties. Thus, Mandelkern and Linzen’s quick route to the referentiality of LM-generated texts fails.
Anthology ID:
2025.cl-2.8
Volume:
Computational Linguistics, Volume 51, Issue 2 - June 2025
Month:
June
Year:
2025
Address:
Cambridge, MA
Venue:
CL
SIG:
Publisher:
MIT Press
Note:
Pages:
651–659
Language:
URL:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/corrections-2025-07/2025.cl-2.8/
DOI:
10.1162/coli_a_00551
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Gary Ostertag. 2025. Language Models and Externalism: A Reply to Mandelkern and Linzen. Computational Linguistics, 51:651–659.
Cite (Informal):
Language Models and Externalism: A Reply to Mandelkern and Linzen (Ostertag, CL 2025)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://preview.aclanthology.org/corrections-2025-07/2025.cl-2.8.pdf