Current research on Event Factuality Prediction (EFP) predominantly treats LLMs as passive classifiers, where high aggregate metrics often mask shortcut learning and unreliable reasoning. In this position paper, we argue for a focus shift from event factuality to meta-factivity. We introduce the Meta-Factivity Framework (MFF), a theoretical roadmap that moves evaluation beyond surface recognition to belief trajectory reasoning and epistemic regulation. By framing hallucination as a failure of meta-cognitive control, we advocate for a transition from measuring black-box accuracy to evaluating white-box cognition, laying the groundwork for a more rigorous benchmark for explainable self-governance.

This report presents the methodology and findings of prompting large language models (LLMs) for Chinese Factivity Inference (FI). We evaluated five LLMs, among which DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated the best overall performance. A combination of Chain-of-Thought (CoT), few-shot, and system-level instructions were combined for final prompting. Additionally, we introduced a pairwise task scheduling strategy and a multi-agent disagreement arbitration mechanism to further enhance inference quality. Experimental results show that the integration of prompting, scheduling, and arbitration strategies significantly improves performance, with DeepSeek-R1 achieving 91.7% overall accuracy on the evaluation set. The report also highlights findings regarding LLM behavior on FI tasks and outlines potential directions for future improvement.